Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cardiol. 2016 Apr 6;214:428–437. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.03.215

Table 2.

Procedural characteristics and outcomes of all study lesions, classified according to use of antegrade dissection re-entry.

Variable Overall Antegrade
Dissection
Re-entry
Non-Antegrade
Dissection
Re-entry
Procedural
Characteristics
and Outcomes
n=1313 n=458 n=855 p
IVUS used (%) 37.6 50.2 30.8 <0.001
Stenting (%) 88.7 84.3 91.0 <0.001
Number of stents* 2.5±1.1 2.9±1.1 2.3±1.0 <0.001
Hemodynamic
support (LVAD)
(%)
4.5 4.4 4.5 0.92
Fluoroscopy time
(min)*
45.8 (27.3-75.2) 58.1 (37.2-87.1) 38.45 (23.7-
67.5)
<0.001
Patient air kerma
dose (Gray)*
3.5 (2-5.4) 4.1 (2.6-6) 3.0 (1.7-5.0) <0.001
Procedure time
(min)*
126 (85-186) 156.5 (112.3-
216.8)
111 (75-165) <0.001
Contrast volume
(ml)*
260 (200-360) 310 (226-411) 250 (180-320) <0.001
Technical success
(%)
90.1 86.9 91.8 0.005
Procedural
success (%)
88.7 85.0 90.7 0.002
MACE (%) 2.4 2.9 2.2 0.42
Death (%) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.88
Myocardial
infarction (%)
1.0 0.9 1.1 0.74
Stroke (%) 0.3 0.0 0.5 0.14
Emergency re-PCI
(%)
0.3 0.2 0.4 0.67
Emergency CABG
(%)
- - - -
Emergency
pericardiocentesis
(%)
0.7 1.8 0.1 <0.001

CABG, coronary artery bypass graft surgery; IVUS, intravascular ultrasound; LVAD, left ventricular assist device; kerma, kinetic energy released per unit mass; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention

*

mean±standard deviation or median (interquartile range).