Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cardiol. 2016 Apr 6;214:428–437. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.03.215

Table 4.

Procedural characteristics and outcomes of lesions approached with antegrade-only techniques, classified according to use of antegrade dissection re-entry.

Variable Overall Antegrade
Dissection
Re-entry
AWE-only
Procedural
Characteristics and
Outcomes
n=767 n=248 n=519 p
IVUS used (%) 10.7 12.3 9.9 0.38
Stenting (%) 91.7 89.7 92.6 0.18
Number of stents* 2.3±1.0 2.7±1.0 2.1±1.0 <0.001
Hemodynamic support
(LVAD) (%)
2.3 1.1 2.8 0.22
Fluoroscopy time (min)* 31.8 (20.1-
46.6)
41.7 (28.4-
58.4)
27.1 (17.8-
38.4)
<0.001
Patient air kerma dose
(Gray)*
2.6(1.6-4.2) 3.1 (2.1-4.7) 2.3 (1.4-3.9) <0.001
Procedure time (min)* 100(67.5-
135.5)
121 (98-159) 87 (60-124) <0.001
Contrast volume (ml)* 245 (180-
318.3)
280 (210-363) 225 (170-300) <0.001
Technical success (%) 93.7 92.7 94.2 0.43
Procedural success (%) 93.3 91.8 94.1 0.23
MACE (%) 1.1 2.1 0.6 0.12
Death (%) 0.1 0.4 0 0.32
Myocardial infarction (%) 0.3 0.8 0 0.10
Stroke (%) 0.3 0 0.4 >0.99
Emergency re-PCI (%) 0.1 0 0.2 >0.99
Emergency CABG (%) - - - -
Emergency
pericardiocentesis (%)
0.03 0.8 0 0.10

CABG, coronary artery bypass graft surgery; IVUS, intravascular ultrasound; LVAD, left ventricular assist device; kerma, kinetic energy released per unit mass; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention

*

mean±standard deviation or median (interquartile range).