Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 10.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2016 Apr 27;55(18):2632–2645. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00050

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparative analysis of the N-terminal domains of FAH superfamily members. (AG) All 21 FAH members available in the Protein Data Bank to date were grouped according to the overall structure of their N-terminal domains. Only one member of each cluster (quite often a dimeric protein) was chosen to represent the overall fold of the group. Representative tertiary and quaternary structures of enzymes from (A) Mus musculus (PDB entry 1QCN (30) and Burkholderia cenocepacia (PDB entry 4QKU); (B) Sulfolobus solfataricus (PDB entry 2Q18 (32); (C) Mycobacterium marinum (PDB entry 3QDF (39), Thermus thermophilus (PDB entry 2DFU and PDB entry 1WZO), M. abscessos (PDB entry 3RR6 (39), Corynebacterium glutamicum (PDB entry 4DBF (33), and M. smegmatis (PDB entry 4PFZ); (D) M. abscessos (PDB entry 3R6O (39) and Sinorhizobium meliloti (PDB entry 3LZK); (E) Homo sapiens (PDB entry 1SAW (31), E. coli (PDB entry 1NR9), Yersinia pestis (PDB entry 3S52), Oleispira antarctica (PDB entry 3V77 (40), B. cenocepacia (PDB entry 4MAQ) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (PDB entry 1NKQ); (F) E. coli HpcE (PDB entry 1GTT (10) and (G) E. coli HpcG (PDB entry 2EB4 (11), E. coli MhpD (PDB entry 2WQT (9) and P. putida NahK (this work). (H) Superposition of representative monomers showing the conserved CTD (incomplete β-barrel and β-sheet) and the position of each NTD.