Table 4.
Performance comparison among competing methods with multi-modal fusion. (ACCuracy (ACC), SENsitivity (SEN), SPEcificity (SPE), Area Under Curve (AUC), fusion of MRI and PET (MP))
| Method | AD vs. NC | MCI vs. NC | MCI-C vs. MCI-NC | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACC | SEN | SPE | AUC | p-value | ACC | SEN | SPE | AUC | p-value | ACC | SEN | SPE | AUC | p-value | |
| MP-N | 89.7 | 92.2 | 89.5 | 94.1 | <0.001 | 71.6 | 96.1 | 43.9 | 82.7 | <0.001 | 62.7 | 22.6 | 93.5 | 73.2 | <0.001 |
| MP-S | 90.8 | 92.6 | 93.8 | 96.7 | <0.001 | 76.3 | 97.0 | 49.9 | 83.4 | <0.001 | 66.9 | 33.9 | 96.0 | 75.7 | <0.001 |
| HOGM | 95.2 | 92.8 | 95.4 | 97.8 | 0.001 | 79.5 | 96.6 | 58.6 | 84.6 | 0.003 | 67.6 | 45.5 | 96.8 | 75.1 | <0.001 |
| M3T | 94.0 | 92.0 | 96.3 | 98.0 | <0.001 | 78.4 | 95.0 | 57.7 | 83.9 | <0.001 | 67.9 | 47.0 | 93.3 | 75.7 | <0.001 |
| Proposed | 95.7 | 96.6 | 98.2 | 98.1 | – | 79.9 | 97.0 | 59.2 | 84.9 | – | 72.4 | 49.1 | 94.6 | 82.9 | – |