Table 4.
Comparing means (n = 341)
| Variable | CSC-W DV, M (SD) | P value |
|---|---|---|
| Work functioning (WRFQ2.0) (n = 318) | ||
| High (n = 93, 29 %) | 14.1 (10.8) | <0.001a |
| Medium (n = 111, 35 %) | 24.2 (13.1) | |
| Low (n = 114, 36 %) | 35.4 (15.0) | |
| Fatigue (CIS) (n = 340) | ||
| Low (n = 114, 34 %) | 20.8 (13.9) | 0.001b |
| Medium (n = 113, 33 %) | 26.3 (15.8) | |
| High (n = 113, 33 %) | 28.5 (16.6) | |
| Depressive symptoms (PHQ-9) (n = 341) | ||
| Low (n = 301, 88 %) | 23.2 (14.7) | <0.001 |
| High (n = 40, 12 %) | 39.6 (16.2) | |
| Perceived health (SF-36) (n = 335) | ||
| High (n = 256, 76 %) | 24.5 (14.8) | 0.14 |
| Low (n = 79, 24 %) | 27.5 (18.4) | |
CSC-W DV, Cognitive Symptom Checklist-Work, Dutch version, WRFQ 2.0, Work Role Functioning Questionnaire, CIS Checklist Individual Strengths, PHQ-9 Patient Health Questionnaire-9, SF-1 Short-Form 36
aPost Hoc analyses (Bonferroni) showed significant differences between all groups
bPost Hoc analyses (Bonferroni) showed no significant difference between the middle and high fatigue group