TABLE 7.
Strength of evidence elements | Acute effect of breakfast vs. no breakfast | Acute effect of breakfast type | Chronic effect of SBP vs. no SBP |
Quality:Scientific rigor/validity; considers design and execution | Grade II Fair: Studies of strong design for the question with minor methodologic concerns. |
Grade III Limited: Studies of weak design for answering the question. |
Grade III Limited: Studies of weak design for answering the question. |
Consistency:Consistency of findings across studies | Grade II Fair: Inconsistency among results of studies with strong design. |
Grade III Limited: Unexplained inconsistency among results from different studies. |
Grade III Limited: Unexplained inconsistency among results from different studies. |
Quantity:Number of studies; number ofsubjects in studies | Grade I Good: One to several good quality studies. Large number of subjects studied. Some studies with negative results have sufficiently large sample size for adequate statistical power. |
Grade III Limited: Limited number of studies. Low number of subjects studied, and/or inadequate sample size within studies. |
Grade III Limited: Limited number of studies. Low number of subjects studied, and/or inadequate sample size within studies. |
Clinical impact:Importance of studied outcomes; magnitude of effect | Grade II Fair: Some doubt about the statistical or clinical significance of the effect. |
Grade III Limited: Size of effect is small or lacks statistical and/or clinical significance. |
Grade III Limited: Size of effect is small or lacks statistical and/or clinical significance. |
Generalizability:Generalizability to population of interest | Grade III Limited: Serious doubts about generalizability because of narrow or different study population, intervention. |
Grade III Limited: Serious doubts about generalizability because of narrow or different study population, intervention. |
Grade I Good: Generalizability limited to scope of experience. |
SBP, school breakfast program.