Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 12.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Hortic. 2015;1061:191–199. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1061.20

Table 1.

Phenology, plant height, pest, yield, and juice characteristics from nine elderberry genotypes grown at three Missouri (USA) sites, 2009–2011; some data excerpted from Thomas et al. (2015a) for comparison, with statistical analysis revised.

Genotype Budbreakz Full
bloomz
Peak
harvestz
Plant
height
(cm)
Eriophyid
mitey
Japanese
beetley
Berry
weight
(mg)
Yield per
plant
(kg)
Cymes
per plant
Cyme
weight
(g)
pH Soluble
solids
(°Brix)
Marge 76.5 ax 156 d 228 cd 178 a 1.0 e 1.2 d 176 a 1.12 a 72 a 21 b 4.57 e 10.2 ab
Bob Gordon 63.0 cde 170 b 223 d 122 bc 2.5 c 1.2 d 88 cd 0.38 bc 21 b 37 ab 4.68 de 10.4 ab
Dallas 65.3 bc 169 b 230 c 119 bcd 1.9 d 1.3 d 95 c 0.40 bc 11 b 43 ab 4.86 bc 9.8 b
Ocoee 64.9 cd 172 b 243 a 114 cd 2.0 d 2.7 ab 84 cd 0.48 bc 12 b 55 a 4.63 de 10.0 b
Ozark 61.2 e 169 b 230 c 119 bcd 2.8 bc 2.2 c 86 cd 0.60 b 21 b 43 ab 4.71 cde 11.3 a
Ozone 64.0 cde 170 b 233 bc 124 b 3.1 ab 2.2 c 76 d 0.28 c 13 b 35 ab 4.78 bcd 10.1 b
Sperandio 64.0 cde 170 b 233 bc 109 d 3.5 a 2.6 b 86 cd 0.31 c 7 b 41 ab 5.04 a 7.9 c
Wyldewood 61.6 de 177 a 236 b 117 bcd 3.1 ab 3.0 a 83 cd 0.28 c 11 b 32 ab 4.92 ab 8.3 c
York 68.5 b 161 c 217 e 119 bcd 2.8 bc 1.3 d 139 b 0.37 bc 21 b 37 ab 4.75 bcd 7.9 c
z

Days from 1 January.

y

Based on 1–5 scale, where 1 = no incidence and 5 = severe incidence.

x

Means within columns with the same letters are not significantly different according to the least significant difference test (P ≤ 0.05).