Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2015 May 29;121(18):3298–3306. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29480

Table 2. Patient Response by intent to treat and EGFR mutation status.

All patients Erlotinib + celecoxib
(n= 54)
Erlotinib + placebo
(n= 53)
CR/PR (%) 12 (22.6) 17 (32.7)
SD (%) 22 (41.5) 13 (25)
PD (%) 19 (35.8) 22 (42.3)
DCR (CR/PR/SD) (%) 34 (64) 30 (57.7)
EGFR wild type Erlotinib + celecoxib
(n= 30)
Erlotinib + placebo
(n= 27)
CR/PR (%) 3 (10) 0 (0)
SD (%) 12 (40) 10 (37)
PD (%) 15 (50) 17 (63)
DCR (CR/PR/SD) (%) 15 (50) 10 (37)
PFS (mo) 3.2 (1.7-6.7) 1.8 (1.7-3.5)
HR (95% CI) 0.54 (0.30-0.97), p= 0.03
EGFR mutation positive Erlotinib + celecoxib
(n= 12)
Erlotinib + placebo
(n= 14)
CR/PR (%) 5 (41.7) 9 (64.3)
SD (%) 6 (50) 4 (29)
PD (%) 1 (8) 1 (7)
DCR (CR/PR/SD) (%) 11 (91.7) 13 (92.9)
PFS (mo) 9.2 (5.4-16.5) 9.2 (4.8-10.8)
HR (95% CI) 0.98 (0.41-2.39), p= 0.97
EGFR not available Erlotinib + celecoxib
(n= 11)
Erlotinib + placebo
(n= 12)
CR/PR (%) 1 (9) 2 (16.7)
SD (%) 5 (45.5) 4 (33.3)
PD (%) 5 (45.5) 6 (50)
DCR (CR/PR/SD) (%) 6 (54.6) 6 (50)
PFS (mo) 2.8 (1.0-8.0) 2.9 (1.8-11.5)
HR (95% CI) 1.48 (0.62-3.5), p= 0.36

CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; DCR (disease control rate); PFS, progression free survival; HR, hazard ratio.