Skip to main content
. 2016 May 3;6(7):e00482. doi: 10.1002/brb3.482

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies included in the meta‐analysis

Author Year Country Ethnicity Age (year) Male (%) Sample size Genotype method Polymorphism Newcastle–Ottawa scale score
Case Control
Rueda et al. 2005 Spain European 74.5 ± 6.0 42.7 53 226 TaqMan −1154G/A 7
Liu et al. 2007 China Asian 67.0 ± 9.8 58.7 155 195 PCR‐RFLP +936C/T 9
Zhang et al. 2007 China Asian 60.3 ± 9.4 62.7 1849 1798 PCR‐RFLP −1154G/A 9
Li et al. 2007 China Asian 62.0 ± 10.3 53.5 200 100 PCR‐RFLP +936C/T 9
Li et al. 2009 China Asian 66.2 ± 5.0 48.0 150 120 PCR‐RFLP +936C/T 7
Kim et al. 2011 South Korea Asian 63.5 ± 11.4 56.6 991 494 PCR +936C/T,−1154G/A 9
Fu et al. 2011 China Asian 64.8 ± 9.6 57.1 147 131 PCR‐RFLP +936C/T,−1154G/A 8
Yu et al. 2012 China Asian 65.4 ± 8.2 67.7 420 456 PCR‐RFLP +936C/T 7
Fontanella et al. 2013 Italy European 55.3 ± 12.0 34.5 200 200 PCR +936C/T 8
Zhang et al. 2014 China Asian 57.6 ± 10.1 51.2 68 118 PCR‐RFLP +936C/T 6