Table 3. Crude and Adjusted Odds Ratios of Predictors of TB Treatment Non-adherence.
Characteristics | Unadjusted Multilevel Model a | Adjusted Multilevel Model | Adjusted Multilevel Model b | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COR (95% CI) | P | AOR (95% CI) | P | AOR (95% CI) | P | ||
Study Group | Control | 1.00 | < 0.001 | 1.00 | < 0.001 | 1.00 | < 0.001 |
Intervention | 0.35 (0.21–0.58) | 0.31 (0.18–0.51) | 0.33 (0.19–0.57) | ||||
Gender | Female | 1.00 | 0.084 | 1.00 | 0.539 | 1.00 | 0.477 |
Male | 1.5 (0.94–2.3) | 1.2 (0.71–1.9) | 1.2 (0.73–1.9) | ||||
Marital Status | Married | 1.00 | 0.029 | 1.00 | 0.051 | 1.00 | 0.044 |
Unmarried | 1.7 (1.1–2.9) | 1.8 (1.00–3.1) | 1.2 (1.0–2.9) | ||||
ART Status | Not on ART | 1.00 | 0.028 | 1.00 | 0.011 | 1.00 | 0.014 |
On ART | 0.45 (0.22–0.92) | 0.46 (0.17–0.81) | 0.39 (0.18–0.83) | ||||
Current Smoking History | Non-smoker | 1.00 | 0.010 | 1.00 | 0.084 | 1.00 | 0.087 |
Smoker | 2.3 (1.2–4.3) | 2.0 (0.91–4.2) | 1.9 (0.91–4.1) | ||||
AUD Risk | No Risk | 1.00 | < 0.001 | 1.00 | 0.033 | 1.00 | 0.039 |
There is risk | 2.5 (1.5–4.2) | 2.0 (1.05–3.9) | 2.0 (1.0–3.7) | ||||
Age (in year) | 1.0 (0.98–1.0) | 0.617 | 0.928 | ||||
Economic Status | 0.91 (0.83–1.0) | 0.043 | 0.93 (0.85–1.0) | 0.168 | 0.93 (0.84–1.0) | 0.136 | |
Psychological Distress | 0.97 (0.95–1.0) | 0.083 | 0.97 (0.94–1.0) | 0.053 | 0.97 (0.99–1.1) | 0.034 | |
Knowledge level | 1.0 (0.97–1.1) | 0.358 | 1.0 (0.98–1.1) | 0.227 | 1.0 (0.94–1.0) | 0.149 | |
Perceived Susceptibility | 1.0 (0.97–1.0) | 0.814 | 1.0 (0.97–1.1) | 0.634 | |||
Perceived Severity | 1.0 (0.95–1.0) | 0.820 | 1.0 (0.94–1.1) | 0.863 | |||
Perceived Barrier | 1.0 (0.98–1.0) | 0.568 | 0.99 (0.98–1.0) | 0.453 | |||
Perceived Benefit | 0.99 (0.94–1.0) | 0.590 | 0.99 (0.92–1.1) | 0.871 | |||
Cue to Action | 0.98 (0.94–1.0) | 0.341 | 0.98 (0.92–1.0) | 0.391 | |||
Perceived Self-efficacy | 0.97 (0.93 1.0) | 0.114 | 0.97 (0.92–1.0) | 0.251 | 0.96 (0.92–1.00) | 0.051 | |
Variance (SE) | Variance (SE) | Variance (SE) | |||||
* | 0.28 (0.19) | 0.29 (0.19) |
* The center effects for each unadjusted multilevel models were different and not presented (because, for each variable the model was different).
a Unadjusted multilevel model, but adjusted for cluster.
b Adjusted Multiple Model after four HBM domains reduced from model.