Table 6.
Fixed Effects and Pseudo R2 Estimates for the Three-Level Random Intercept Models First Grade Outcomes
| Fall Predictors | Spring Reading Outcomes
|
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WID
|
SWE
|
PC
|
||||
| Coeff. | SE | Coeff. | SE | Coeff. | SE | |
| Model 1 | ||||||
| Intercept | 42.15*** | 0.64 | 40.53*** | 17.66*** | 0.24 | |
| Word attack | 0.96*** | 0.05 | 1.13*** | 0.28*** | 0.02 | |
| DA | −1.19*** | 0.15 | −0.72*** | −0.43*** | 0.01 | |
| Pseudo R2 (%) | ||||||
| WA + DA | 63.6 | 48.5 | 51.1 | |||
| Unique WA | 18.6 | 17.9 | 12.3 | |||
| Unique DA | 5.6 | 3.3 | 5.1 | |||
| Model 2 | ||||||
| Intercept | 42.19*** | 0.48 | 40.62*** | 0.60 | 17.65*** | 0.18 |
| Letter naming | 0.12*** | 0.04 | 0.20*** | 0.04 | 0.03* | 0.01 |
| Sound naming | −0.04 | 0.04 | −0.03 | 0.05 | −0.01 | 0.01 |
| Rapid automatized naming—Letters | −0.13*** | 0.04 | −0.13** | 0.04 | −0.03* | 0.01 |
| Rapid automatized naming—Digits | −0.03 | 0.04 | −0.12** | 0.04 | −0.01 | 0.01 |
| Elision | 0.21 | 0.14 | 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.05 |
| Sound matching | 0.21* | 0.12 | 0.26 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| Oral vocabulary | 0.03 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.11* | 0.06 |
| DA | −0.64*** | 0.18 | −0.03 | 0.24 | −0.18** | 0.06 |
| Listening comp | −0.02 | 0.13 | −0.16 | 0.13 | 0.09* | 0.04 |
| Word attack | 0.57*** | 0.06 | 0.61*** | 0.09 | 0.10*** | 0.02 |
| Attention | 0.13** | 0.06 | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| Hyperactivity | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| IQ | 0.07* | 0.03 | 0.13** | 0.04 | 0.07*** | 0.01 |
| Pseudo R2 (%) | ||||||
| All Predictors | 74.3 | 68.13 | 67.9 | |||
| Unique DA | 2.3 | 0.4 | 1.0 | |||
Note: N = 318. All models are based on raw scores. WID = word identification; SWE = sight word efficiency; PC = passage comprehension; Coeff. = coefficient; DA = dynamic assessment; WA = word attack; comp = comprehension.
*
p < .05.
**
p < .01.
***
p < .001.