Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am Sociol Rev. 2016 Mar 2;81(2):262–289. doi: 10.1177/0003122416630982

Table C1.

Logistic Regression Models of the Consequences of Employment Histories for Receiving a Callback from an Employer, by Applicant Gender

Male Applicants Female Applicants All Applicants
(1) (2) (3)
Employment History
 Full-Time (omitted)
 Part-Time −.821* (.341) .0484 (.272) −.821* (.341)
 Temporary Agency −.419 (.285) −.251 (.305) −.419 (.285)
 Skills Underutilization −.859* (.397) −.748* (.348) −.859* (.397)
 Unemployment −.960** (.294) −.352 (.255) −.960** (.294)
Interactions
 Part-Time x Female .869* (.436)
 Temporary x Female .168 (.417)
 Underutilization x Female .111 (.528)
 Unemployment x Female .608 (.389)
Female Applicant .00457 (.254)
Constant −2.158*** (.179) −2.154*** (.181) −2.158*** (.179)
n (clusters) 599 611 1,210
n (observations) 1,198 1,222 2,420

Notes: Clustered standard errors are in parentheses. Log-odds presented.

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01;

***

p < .001 (two-tailed tests).