Skip to main content
. 2016 May 12;11(5):e0155327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155327

Table 7. Comparison of the original results of GapFiller and after manual curation with GapBlaster.

Staphylococcus aureus #Gaps GF #N GF #Gaps after GB #N after GB
AbySS 69 56355 66 54837
AbySS2 35 10003 30 8741
Allpaths-LG 40 10472 39 10455
Bambus2 98 30771 97 30725
MSR-CA 80 11651 76 9794
SGA 654 312284 646 307095
Rhodobacter sphaeroides #Gaps GF #N GF #Gaps after GB #N after GB
AbySS 306 118298 304 118287
AbySS2 290 68052 288 67740
Allpaths-LG 164 24001 163 23780
CABOG 191 25011 190 24336
MSR-CA 336 37494 333 33590
SGA 930 1159235 929 1159162

The results produced by GapFiller were used as input for GapBlaster, and the organism/assemblies that were improved are shown. The #Gaps GF and #N GF show the amount of gaps and Ns, respectively, in the results of GapFiller. The #Gaps after GB and #N after GB show the amount of remaining gaps and Ns, respectively, after the use of GapBlaster.