Skip to main content
. 2016 May 12;11(5):e0155101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155101

Table 2. Sensitivity and specificity of LAMP (compared to MGIT) by HIV status and smear status (n = 233).

Sensitivity Specificity
Overall Smear positive and culture positive Smear negative and culture positive
Overall (n = 233) a
    Correct-no/total no 26/40 (65.0%) 23/35 (65.7%) 3/5 (60.0%) 193/193 (100%)
    95% CI (48.3%– 79.4%) (47.8%– 80.9%) (14.7%– 94.7%) (98.0%– 100%)
HIV Positive (n = 102)
    Correct-no/total no 10/15 (66.7%) 8/12 (66.7%) 2/3 (66.7%) 87/87 (100%)
    95% CI (38.4%– 88.2%) (34.9%– 90.0%) (9.4%– 99.2%) (95.9%– 100%)
HIV Negative (n = 112)
    Correct-no/total no 10/19 (52.6%) 9/17 (52.9%) 1/2 (50.0%) 93/93 (100%)
    95% CI (28.9%– 75.6%) (27.8%– 77.0%) (1.3%– 98.7%) (96.1%– 100%)

a Includes 19 samples from participants with unknown HIV status