Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Emot Behav Disord. 2010 Apr 16;19(3):182–192. doi: 10.1177/1063426610367793

Table 2.

Evidence Based Treatment Dissemination Center Consultation Call Completion, Dropout, and Attendance Results for Years 1 and 2

Year 1
Year 2
n % n %
Clinician completion ratea 193 80.1 150 80.2
Clinician dropout for clinician callsb 92 27.6 82 29.4
Non–program specificc (Y1 n = 92, Y2 n = 90)
    Left agency 19 20.7 20 24.4
    Maternity or medical leave 4 4.3 6 7.3
Program specific
    Low attendance 26 28.3 26 31.7
    Personal or time conflict 15 16.3 6 7.3
    Switched to E3 call N/A 4 4.9
    Agency dropout N/A 2 2.4
    Difficulty finding clients 5 5.4 N/A
    Phone problems 3 3.3 N/A
    Other or missing 20 21.7 18 22.0
    Mean clinician attendance rated 84.6 83.4
Supervisor completion ratee N/A 30 48.0
Supervisor dropout rate for supervisor callsc N/A 13 17.0
Non–program specific
    Left agency N/A 3 23.1
    Maternity or medical leave N/A 0 0.0
Program specific
    Personal or time conflict N/A 1 7.7
    Switched to E3 call N/A 1 7.7
    Agency dropout N/A 2 15.4
    No clients N/A N/A
    Phone problems N/A N/A
    Other or missing N/A 1 7.7
    Low attendance N/A 5 38.5
    Mean supervisor attendance rate N/A 70.0
a

Excludes dropouts; Y1 n = 241, Y2 n = 189.

b

Y1 n = 333, Y2 n = 306.

c

A survey of supervisors’ reasons for dropping out was not performed in Year 1, given that no formal supervisor program existed; Y2 n = 54.

d

Attendance rates refer to the average attendance across consultation call groups.

e

Supervisor completion and noncompletion rates were not measured in Year 1, given that no supervisor-specific program existed; Y2 n = 64.