Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 12.
Published in final edited form as: China Economic J. 2015 Nov 24;8(3):191–214. doi: 10.1080/17538963.2015.1102473

Table 4.

Contact and financial transfers by living arrangements of non-co-resident children.

Overall Live in the
county
Do not live
in the county
P-value
Transfer to Parents
  Fraction Positive 0.30
(0.01)
0.28
(0.01)
0.37
(0.01)
0.00
  Amount if > 0 (1000 RMB) 2.41
(0.39)
1.74
(0.19)
4.01
(1.24)
0.00
Transfer from Parents
  Fraction Positive 0.08
(0.00)
0.08
(0.00)
0.08
(0.01)
0.00
  Amount if > 0 (1000 RMB) 3.31
(0.51)
3.53
(0.61)
2.59
(0.81)
0.00
Net Transfer
  Average Amount (1000 RMB) 1.41
(0.37)
0.68
(0.22)
3.23
(1.16)
0.00
Contact
  # of Visits per Year 97.72
(1.60)
123.27
(1.90)
10.30
(0.97)
0.00
  # of other Communications per Year*
58.58
(1.38)

63.27
(1.67)

44.26
(1.67)

0.00
Observations 13145 9999 3146

Note:

1

Sample: non-co-resident adult children from CHARLS elderly households (with at least one respondent 60 or above).

2

Transfer amounts to parent and from parent are defined as the average amount conditional on the amount is positive.

3

Net transfer is defined as the amount of transfer from child to parents minus the amount of transfer the child received from parents.

4

Clustered standard errors at family level in brackets.

5

P-values of testing whether the means are equal are provided in the last column.

*

Other communications include email, mail, phone calls, text messages, etc.