Skip to main content
. 2016 May;62(5):e263–e267.

Table 1.

Effect of year of training and related experience on mean scores for competency areas on the FM-MAP test

COMPETENCY AREA MEAN (SD) SCORE BY YEAR OF TRAINING MEAN (SD) SCORE BY EXPER IENCE IN RELATED ROTATION


FIRST SECOND < 1 MO 1 MO
Behavioural medicine 80.1 (11.1) 78.1 (12.1) NA* NA*
Care of children and adolescents 59.1 (8.1) 60.1 (8.1) 58.9 (8.0) 61.1 (8.2)
Care of the elderly 79.1 (9.1) 79.1 (9.1) 79.5 (9.3) 79.1 (7.0)
Emergency medicine 69.1 (9.1) 72.1 (9.1) 70.0 (8.6) 71.8 (9.3)
End-of-life care 75.1 (7.1) 75.1 (8.1) 74.8 (7.5) 79.1 (7.6)
Family medicine 89.1 (7.1) 89.1 (8.1) NA* NA*
In-hospital care 69.1 (15.1) 71.1 (14.1) 68.9 (15.2) 71.1 (13.8)
Maternity care 84.1 (9.1) 87.1 (8.1)§ 83.5 (9.0) 81.1 (7.7)§
Mental health care 79.1 (9.1) 81.1 (8.1) 79.8 (8.8) 80.8 (5.9)
Musculoskeletal medicine 64.1 (11.1) 65.1 (12.1) NA* NA*
Surgical skills 79.1 (12.1) 82.1 (13.1) 80.1 (12.7) 83.1 (11.7)
Women’s health 80.1 (10.1) 83.1 (9.1) 81.1 (9.8) 82.2 (6.8)

FM-MAP—Family Medicine Mandatory Assessment of Progress, NA—not applicable.

*

There were 3 competency areas that could not be linked to a single rotation for experiential analysis.

Effect is significant (P < .05).

Effect is significant (P < .01).

§

Effect is significant (P < .001).