Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct;50(9):742–746. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000447

Table 1.

Demographics, comorbidities, and prior CDI history among CDI and alternative diagnosis patients

CDI Alternative diagnosis OR (95% CI) P value (unadjusted)
N 88 29
Age (mean) 64.3 50.3 2.55 (0.48–4.58) 0.0162*,**
Female/male 2.4 2.2 0.81 (0.32–1.982 0.636
Diarrhea at presentation? n (%) 35 (39.7) 10 (34.5) 0.90 (0.38–2.16) 0.815
CDI Episodes n (%):
1–2 11 (12.5) 15 (51.7) 7.43 (2.64–20.95) 0.0002**,
≥3 77 (87.5) 14 (48.3)
Comorbidities and medications n (%)
DMa 16 (18.2) 2 (6.9) 0.526 (0.139–1.99) 0.3407
IBSb 9 (10.2) 14 (48.3) 7.58 (2.77–20.83) 0.0001**
IBDc 12 (13.6) 1 (3.5) 0.22 (0.026–1.77) 0.1517
Malignancy 12 (13.6) 5 (17.2) 1.22 (0.39–3.85) 0.7361
PPId 3 (3.4) 1 (3.5) 0.97 (0.094–9.90) 0.9762
Immunosuppressives 10 (11.4) 1 (3.5) 0.29 (0.032–2.22) 0.2183
*

For each additional year of age, there is a 2.55% increased likelihood of having an alternative diagnosis,

**

p<0.05,

This denotes significance in a comparison of least square means between the two groups “1 to 2” episodes and “3 and above” episodes, which is unadjusted.

a

Diabetes mellitus,

b

irritable bowel syndrome,

c

inflammatory bowel disease,

d

proton pump inhibitor