Skip to main content
. 2016 May 13;10:127. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2016.00127

Table 1.

Response of TREK-2 tandem-linked channels and mutants to 2-APB and pHo changes.

2-APB response pHo response
Channel ARamax nb IRcmax nb
WT-WT 18.13 ± 1.30 8–13 0.73 ± 0.02 8–9
ΔpCt-ΔpCt 4.34 ± 0.10 7 0.46 ± 0.01 7
WT-ΔpCt 15.50 ± 0.74 5–7 0.79 ± 0.01 5
ΔpCt-WT 17.37 ± 1.56 5–6 0.77 ± 0.02 6
WT-ΔCt 18.15 ± 2.42 5–7 0.76 ± 0.03 7–9
ΔCt-WT 16.78 ± 1.50 6–7 0.81 ± 0.02 6–10
WT-G312A 17.16 ± 1.00 6–8 0.76 ± 0.04 6–7
G312A-WT 16.84 ± 2.00 6–7 0.79 ± 0.01 6–7
G312A-G312A 7.80 ± 0.50 5–7 0.23 ± 0.02 5–7
G312A-ΔpCt 5.32 ± 0.46 7 0.43 ± 0.03 11–12
G312A-G312A/ΔpCt 3.36 ± 0.37 7–8 0.12 ± 0.05 7–12

aThe maximal concentrations of 2-APB used in these curves is 333 μM for these channels, except for ΔpCt-ΔpCt (800 μM). bThe number of oocytes used for each point in concentration response curves. cThe maximal inhibition produced by pH9.3.