Skip to main content
. 2016 May 9;37(3):213–225. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.04.008

Figure 5.

Figure 5

DC Protrusion Analysis

(A–E) Direction of DC protrusions in vivo (arrowheads, A–C) was measured in relation to the SL external surface (D) to reveal a bias toward the SL (E, n = 64 embryos, 1445 protrusions).

(F and G) Frames from time-lapse imaging showing DC protrusions (arrowheads) ex vivo (see Figure 2D). Protrusions are apparent in the vicinity of the SL in control (CoMo) but not in the C3aRMo-treated explants. Green, membrane; red, nuclei.

(H–J) Protrusion activity in the ex vivo assay analyzed using the extension-retraction method. Red shows the difference in membrane signal (green) between frames 3 min apart (H). The difference reveals the extending protrusions (I, purple).

(K–N) Ex vivo apical protrusive activity of DCs (L and M: green, membrane; red, protrusion; blue, nuclei) is decreased in C3aR-deficient explants (N: n = 32; ∗∗∗p < 0.01; error, SD).