Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 13;58(3):186–192. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.15-61

Table 3.

Passing–Bablok regression and concordance correlation analysis for each immunoassay against LC-MS/MS total or 25(OH)D2

Passing–Bablok regression
Concordance correlation
Intercept 95%CI Slope 95%CI Cusum test CCC 95%CI r Cb
Before-Centaur 16.9 10.8 to 22.1 0.48 0.34 to 0.65 p>0.05 0.43 0.25 to 0.58 0.52 0.83
Before-Elecsys −5.3 −19.4 to 3.6 1.12 0.87 to 1.47 p>0.05 0.69 0.52 to 0.80 0.69 0.99
After-Centaur −13.8 4.4 to 19.8 0.53 0.42 to 0.73 p>0.05 0.39 0.25 to 0.51 0.68 0.58
After-Elecsys 13.8 −22.9 to 1.9 1 0.78 to 1.22 p>0.05 0.61 0.45 to 0.73 0.75 0.81
Adjusted 25(OH)D2
 Centaur −8.4 −13.1 to −3.7 1.05 0.73 to 1.50 p>0.05 0.34 0.17 to 0.49 0.54 0.63
 Elecsys −19.1 −30.8 to 10.9 1.54 1.07 to 2.50 p>0.05 0.26 0.09 to 0.42 0.41 0.64

CCC, concordance correlation coefficient; CI, confidence interval; r, Pearson’s correlation coefficient; Cb, bias correction factor; Before-Centaur, Centaur values before treatment; Before-Elecsys, Elecsys values before treatment; After-Centaur, Centaur values after treatment; After-Elecsys, Elecsys values after treatment.