Skip to main content
. 2016 May 18;7(5):301–307. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i5.301

Table 1.

Case series of valgus osteotomy for nonunion

Ref. n Average follow-up (yr) Union rate, n/total (%) AVN, n/total (%) Implant Functional outcome
Marti et al[10] 50 7.1 43/50 (86) 22/50 (44) DABP HHS: 91
Anglen et al[15] 13 2 13/13 (100) 2/13 (15) DABP HHS: 93
Wu et al[33] 32 32/32 (100) 2/32 (6) SHS +/- (subtrochanteric osteotomy) NA
Kalra et al[23] (neglected fractures) 22 2.5 20/22 (85) 2/22 (9) DABP 75%; excellent to good results
Sringari et al[34] 20 2 18/20 (90) Nil DABP NA
Magu et al[11] 48 6 44/48 (94) 2/48 (4) DABP HHS: 86.7
Khan et al[35] 16 2.5 14/16 (87) Nil SHS (120 degree plate) HHS: 88
Said et al[29] 36 3.5 35/36 (97) 5/36 (13) Angled blade plate (prebent 130 degree) NA
Sen et al[26] 22 3.2 21/22 (91) 5/55 (22) DABP + non-vasc fibula 66%; excellent to good results
Gadegone et al[7] 41 2.75 39/41 (95) 7/41 (17) SHS (110-130 prebent plate + non-vasc fibula) HHS: 90.9
Gavaskar et al[28] 11 1 11/11 (100) Nil SHS + subtrochanteric osteotomy, no wedge taken Oxford score: 40
Gupta et al[36] 60 3.5 56/60 (93) 4/60 (6) SHS (135 degree subtrochanteric osteotomy) HHS: 87.5
Varghese et al[14] 32 5 29/32 (91) 13/32 (44) DABP HHS: 82

DABP: Double-angled blade plate; HHS: Harris hip score; NA: Not available; SHS: Sliding hip screw.