−1 |
Inferiority compared to the relevant comparator |
None |
– |
|
Non-relevant comparator |
|
|
|
Unacceptable methodology |
|
|
|
Lack of proof |
|
|
0 |
Non-inferiority compared to the relevant comparator |
Same as that of the comparator |
Article R 163-5 (a price that will enable expenditure savings versus the comparator) |
1 |
Minor improvement compared to the relevant comparator |
Same as that of the comparator |
Framework agreement with CEPS |
|
Improvement of conditions of use with impact on care and non-inferiority compared to the comparator |
|
|
2 |
Moderate improvement compared to the relevant comparator |
Same as that of the comparator |
Framework agreement with CEPS |
≥3 |
Major improvement compared to the relevant comparator |
Same as or more than that of the comparator |
Framework agreement with CEPS |