Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 29;2:10.3402/jmahp.v2.22813. doi: 10.3402/jmahp.v2.22813

Table VII.

Distribution of regulatory application type by classification types within reformulation cases

Designation change Approval time Marketing Authorization Patent expiry Company Brand name Reformulation group







Application type No change Orphan drugs Non orphan Orphan to orphan Before 1999 1999–2008 After 2008 Before MA After MA Before PE After PE Same company Different company Same brand Different brand Group 0 Group 1 Group 2 Group 3
United States 24 2 0 0 7 15 4 0 26 17 9 18 8 8 18 7 6 7 6
NDA type 1 section 505(b) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NDA type 2 section 505(b) 2 (8.3%) 0 0 0 0 2 (13.3%) 0 0 2 (7.7%) 1 (5.9%) 1 (11.1%) 1 (5.6%) 1 (12.5%) 0 2 (11.1%) 2 (28.6%) 0 0 0
NDA type 3 section 505 (b) 12 (50.0%) 2 (100.0%) 0 0 6 (85.7%) 7 (46.7%) 1 (25.0%) 0 14 (53.8%) 10 (58.8%) 4 (44.4%) 11 (61.1%) 3 (37.5%) 5 (62.5%) 9 (50.0%) 1 (14.3%) 4 (66.7%) 4 (57.1%) 5 (83.3%)
NDA type 3 section 505 (b)(2) 3 (12.5%) 0 0 0 1 (14.3%) 2 (13.3%) 0 0 3 (11.5%) 2 (11.8%) 1 (11.1%) 1 (5.6%) 2 (25.0%) 1 (12.5%) 2 (11.1%) 1 (14.3%) 1 (16.7%) 1 (14.3%) 0
NDA type 4 section 505 (b) 1 (4.2%) 0 0 0 0 1 (6.7%) 0 0 1 (3.8%) 0 1 (11.1%) 0 1 (12.5%) 0 1 (5.6%) 1 (14.3%) 0 0 0
NDA type 5 section 505(b) 1 (4.2%) 0 0 0 0 1 (6.7%) 0 0 1 (3.8%) 1 (5.9%) 0 1 (5.6%) 0 0 1 (5.6%) 1 (14.3%) 0 0 0
NDA type 5 section 505(b)(2) 2 (8.3%) 0 0 0 0 2 (13.3%) 0 0 2 (7.7%) 1 (5.9%) 1 (11.1%) 1 (5.6%) 1 (12.5%) 0 2 (11.1%) 1 (14.3%) 1 (16.7%) 0 0
NDA type 6 section 505(b) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
sNDA (new indication) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
sNDA (new formulation) 1 (4.2%) 0 0 0 0 0 1 (25.0%) 0 1 (3.8%) 0 1 (11.1%) 1 (5.6%) 0 0 1 (5.6%) 0 0 1 (14.3%) 0
sBLA 2 (8.3%) 0 0 0 0 0 2 (50.0%) 0 2 (7.7%) 2 (11.8%) 0 2 (11.1%) 0 2 (25.0%) 0 0 0 1 (14.3%) 1 (16.7%)
France 15 0 0 2 8 7 2 0 17 13 4 13 4 8 9 5 3 3 6
National 9 (60.0%) 0 0 0 7 (87.5%) 2 (28.6%) 0 0 9 (52.9%) 8 (61.5%) 1 (25.0%) 8 (61.5%) 1 (25.0%) 4 (50.0%) 5 (55.6%) 3 (60.0%) 3 (100.0%) 1 (33.3%) 2 (33.3%)
MR 3 (20.0%) 0 0 0 1 (12.5%) 2 (28.6%) 0 0 3 (17.6%) 1 (7.7%) 2 (50.0%) 1 (7.7%) 2 (50.0%) 0 3 (33.3%) 1 (20.0%) 0 0 2 (33.3%)
Centralized 3 (20.0%) 0 0 2 (100.0%) 0 3 (42.9%) 2 (100.0%) 0 5 (29.4%) 4 (30.8%) 1 (25.0%) 4 (30.8%) 1 (25.0%) 4 (50.0%) 1 (11.1%) 1 (20.0%) 0 2 (66.7%) 2 (33.3%)
United Kingdom 17 0 0 2 6 9 4 0 19 13 6 14 5 7 12 5 3 5 6
National 14 (82.4%) 0 0 0 6 (100.0%) 6 (66.67%) 2 (50.0%) 0 14 (73.7%) 9 (69.2%) 5 (83.3%) 10 (71.4%) 4 (80.0%) 3 (42.9%) 11 (91.7%) 4 (80.0%) 3 (100.0%) 3 (60.0%) 4 (66.7%)
MR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Centralized 3 (17.6%) 0 0 2 (100.0%) 0 3 (33.3%) 2 (50.0%) 0 5 (26.2%) 4 (30.8%) 1 (16.7%) 4 (28.6%) 1 (20.0%) 4 (57.1%) 1 (8.3%) 1 (20.0%) 0 2 (40.0%) 2 (33.3%)
Germany 10 0 0 2 3 7 2 0 12 11 1 10 2 6 6 4 1 3 4
National 7 (70.0%) 0 0 0 3 (100.0%) 4 (57.1%) 0 0 7 (58.3%) 7 (63.6%) 0 6 (60.0%) 1 (50.0%) 2 (33.3%) 5 (83.3%) 3 (75.0%) 1 (100.0%) 1 (33.3%) 2 (50.0%)
MR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Centralized 3 (30.0%) 0 0 2 (100.0%) 0 3 (42.9%) 2 (100.0%) 0 5 (41.7%) 4 (36.4%) 1 (100.0%) 4 (40.0%) 1 (50.0%) 4 (66.7%) 1 (16.7%) 1 (25.0%) 0 2 (66.7%) 2 (50.0%)

MA, market authorization; PE, patent expiry; MR, Mutual Recognition.