Skip to main content
. 2016 May 13;15:49. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0120-9

Table 6.

Clinical guidelines and pathways identified (n = 12)

Category Reference Date Title Disease Setting Emmanuel’s criteriaa n (%) Recommendations based on…b
Guidelines in non-cancer Aldasoro et al. [22] 2012 Necesidades en cuidados paliativos de las enfermedades no oncológicas. Un estudio cualitativo desde la perspectiva de profesionales, pacientes y personas cuidadoras (Needs in PC of the non oncologic diseases. A qualitative study from the professionals perspective, patients and carers) Non cancer All settings 4 (36 %) Other options: Mixed methods corresponding to the “focused ethnography”
Pathways in non-cancer Arnedillo et al. [23] 2012 Consenso sobre Atención Integral de las Agudizaciones de la Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica ATINA-EPOC (Consensus on integrated care of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ATINA-EPOC) COPD Not applicable 8 (73 %) Consensus methods only
Pathways in non-cancer Gómez-Batiste et al. [24] 2011 Proyecto NECPAL CCOMS-ICO. Identificación y atención integral-integrada de personas con enfermedades crónicas avanzadas en servicios de salud y sociales (NECPAL CCOMS-ICO Project. Identification and Integral-integrated attention of patients with advanced chronic diseases in health and social services) Advanced chronic diseases All settings 5 (45 %) Systematic review and consensus methods
Pathway general approach Agustín et al. [17] 2011 Manual para el manejo del paciente en Cuidados Paliativos en Urgencias Extrahospitalarias (Manual for patient management in PC in Extrahospital emergencies) Cancer Emergencies outside the hospitals 4 (36 %) Consensus methods only
Guidelines general approach SECPAL [15] 2010 Guía de Cuidados Paliativos (Palliative Care Guideline) Cáncer and non cáncer All settings 3 (27 %) Unclear methods
Guidelines general approach Colomer et al. [16] 2009 Unidad de Cuidados Paliativos: Estándares y recomendaciones (Palliative Care Unit: Standards and recommendations) Cáncer and non cáncer All settings 8 (73 %) Systematic review and consensus methods
Guidelines general approach Arrieta et al. [13] 2008 Guía de Práctica Clínica sobre Cuidados Paliativos (Clinical practical guideline on Palliative care) Cancer and non cancer All settings 10 (91 %) Systematic review, consensus methods, evidence based and quality assessment
Guidelines general approach González et al. [14] 2008 Guía de Cuidados Paliativos de la Comunidad de Madrid (Palliative Care guidelines of the Autonomous Community of Madrid) Cancer and non cancer All settings 5 (45 %) Unclear methods
Pathways general approach Cía et al. [18] 2007 Proceso asistencial integrado de Cuidados Paliativos (Palliative Care Integrated assistential Process) Cancer and non cancer Home and hospital settings 7 (63 %) Systematic review and consensus methods
Guidelines in cancer Carvajal et al. [19] 2006 Guía de recomendaciones clínicas: Cáncer colorrectal (Clinical recommendation guideline: Colon cancer) Colorrectal cancer All settings 4 (36 %) Systematic review and consensus methods
Pathways in cancer Naveira et al. [53] 2005 Cuidados paliativos en el enfermo oncologico. Documentos para la gestión integrada de procesos asistenciales relacionados con el cancer. Proyecto Oncoguias (Palliative Care for the oncologic patient. Documents for integrated management of assitential processes related to Cancer. “Oncoguías” Project) Cancer All settings 4 (36 %) Unclear methods
Pathways general approach Hernández et al. [17] 2004 Programa de cuidados domiciliarios en atención primaria (Home Care program in Primary attention) Cancer and non cancer Home setting 6 (56 %) Unclear

aThe 11 aspects assessed by “Emmanuel’s” are: discussion of illness limitations and prognosis; recommendations for conducting a whole patient assessment including the patient’s physical, social, psychological and spiritual issues, their family and community setting; recommendations for when to make these recommendations; recommendations on when PC should be integrated; assessment of the patient’s goals for care, continuous goal adjustment as the illness and the person’s disease progresses, PC interventions to reduce suffering, advance care planning, recommendations on involving a PC team, recommendations on PC at the last moments of life and recommendations on grief and bereavement [10]

bThe guidelines/pathays’ recommendations were based on the following methods: 1) Systematic review, consensus methods, evidence based and quality assessment; 2) Systematic review and consensus methods; 3) Systematic review only; 4) Consensus methods only; 5) Unclear methods; 6) Other options