Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Qual Life Res. 2015 Nov 14;25(6):1409–1421. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1181-6

Table 1.

Summary of included studies.

Author,
Year
Country Sample
size (n)
Typea Postoperative
timing of
assessmentb
PRO Instrumentc MINORS
Score
Stefanek,
1995
USA 14 CS 6 – 30 months -Patient satisfaction with outcomes
-Patient satisfaction with decision to have BPM
-Psychosocial well-being
Ad hoc
CES-D
12
Borgen, 1998 USA 370 CS 0.2 – 51.5 years -Patient satisfaction with outcomes
-Patient regret
Ad hoc 5
Frost, 2000 USA 572 CS NA -Patient satisfaction with outcomes
-Psychosocial well-being
-Body image
-Sexual well-being
Ad hoc 7
Hatcher, 2001 UK 79 PC Preoperative, 6
and 18 months
-Psychosocial well-being
-Body image
-Sexual well-being
BIS
GHQ-30
SAQ
SSTAI
7
Metcalfe,
2004
Canada 60 CS 6 – 117 months -Patient satisfaction with decision to have BPM
-Psychosocial well-being
-Body image
-Sexual well-being
Ad hoc
BIBC
BSI
SAQ
5
Metcalfe,
2004
Canada 37 CS Mean 53.8 months -Patient satisfaction with outcomes
-Body image
-Sexual well-being
Ad hoc
BSI
5
Contant,
2004
Netherlands 61 CS 1 year -Patient satisfaction with outcomes
-Sexual well-being
Ad hoc 5
Metcalfe,
2005
Canada 60 CS Mean 52.2
months
-Psychosocial well-being QOLI 5
Geiger, 2007 USA 106 CS NA -Patient satisfaction with outcomes
-Patient satisfaction with decision to have BPM
-Psychosocial well-being
-Body image
-Sexual well-being
Ad hoc
CES-D
6
Gahm, 2007 Sweden 24 CS Mean 5 years -Sexual well-being
-Somatosensory function.
Ad hoc 5
Spear, 2008 USA 27 CS NA -Patient satisfaction with outcomes Ad hoc 7
Brandberg,
2008
Sweden 90 PC Preoperatively,
6 and 12 months
-Psychosocial well-being
-Body image
-Sexual well-being
Ad hoc
BIS
HADS
SAQ
SF-36
7
Isern, 2008 Sweden 30 CS NA -Patient satisfaction with outcomes
-Patient regret
Ad hoc 6
Gahm, 2010 Sweden 24 CS Median 29 months -Patient satisfaction with outcomes Ad hoc 11
Gahm, 2010 Sweden 36 CS Mean 5.4 years -Patient satisfaction with outcomes Ad hoc 6
Gahm, 2010 Sweden 59 CS Mean 29 months -Psychosocial well-being
-Sexual well-being
-Patient regret
-Somatosensory function
Ad hoc
DRS
SF-36
6
Brandberg,
2012
Sweden 91 PC Preoperatively,
6 and 12 months
-Patient satisfaction with outcomes
-Somatosensory function
Ad hoc 7
Sahin, 2013 Turkey 21 CS NA -Patient satisfaction with outcomes MBROS-S 6
Eltahir, 2013 Netherlands 28 CS NA -Psychosocial well-being HADS 9
Gopie, 2013 Netherlands 48 PC Preoperatively,
6 months
-Psychosocial well-being
-Body image
-Sexual well-being
Ad hoc
DRQ
IES
SF-36
7
Gahm, 2013 Sweden 46 CS Median 29
months
-Sexual well-being
-Somatosensory function
Ad hoc 6
Hagen, 2014 Norway 163 CS NA -Patient satisfaction with outcomes
-Patient satisfaction with decision to have BPM
Ad hoc 6
a

CS: Case Series. PC: Prospective Cohort.

b

NA: Not Available

c

BIBC: Body Image after Breast Cancer, BIS: Body Image Scale, BSI: Brief Symptom Inventory, CES-D: Center for Epidemiologic Depression Scale, DRQ: Dutch Relationship Questionnaire, DRS: Decision Regret Scale, GHQ: General Health Questionnaire, HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, IES: Impact of Events Scale, MBROS-S: Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study – Satisfaction, QOLI: Quality of life index, SAQ: Sexual Activity Questionnaire, SF-36: 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, SSTAI: Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.