Table 1. Comparative study.
Bonding | Applicability | Cost | Time | Functionalization† | Filling£ | ULSIǂ | Storing† | ReuseΩ | Adhesion (MPa)Σ | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Surface oxidation | Limited€ | High | Short | No | No | Yes | No | No | 0.40–0.51 | 16,17,50 |
Adhesive | Moderate | Low | Moderate | Moderate | Yes | Moderate | Yes | No | 0.20–0.51 | 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24,31 |
Functionalization | Wide | High | Long | No | No | No | Yes | No | 0.18–1.03 | 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30,34, 35, 36 |
SWB | Wide | Low | Short | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | 0.63–0.98 | This paper |
Comparison of some parameters related to methods for bonding PDMS to PDMS itself, glass, and non-silicon compounds.
€Limited to silicon-based compounds.
†Before bonding.
£Alteration in dimensions of microchannel.
ǂViability for ULSI processes.
ΩRegeneration after successive leakages and reversible property.
ΣBurst pressure.