Skip to main content
. 2016 May 16;6:25992. doi: 10.1038/srep25992

Table 1. Clinicopathologic characteristics of the 297 patients.

Parameter Number of patients Percent (%)
Age, mean (range), yrs: 41.4 ± 8.6 (22–74)
 ≤45 207 69.7
 >45 90 30.3
Tumor sizea, mean (range), cm: 1.2 ± 0.6 (0.2–2.0)
Stage
 Ia2 50 16.8
 Ib1 247 83.2
Histology
 SCCb 279 93.9
 ADc 16 5.4
 ASCd 2 0.7
Grade
 1 79 26.6
 2 136 45.8
 3 82 27.6
Conization parameter
Conization
 LEEPe 40 13.5
 CKCf 257 86.5
Tumor width, mean (range), mm: 12.98 ± 7.7 (0.2–4.0)
 ≤20 mm 262 88.2
 >20 mm 35 11.8
Depth of stromal invasion, mean (range), mm: 4.1 ± 2.3 (1.0–13.0)
 ≤5 mm 237 79.8
 >5 mm 60 20.2
LVSIg 47 15.8
Positive RMh 155 52.2
 Ectocervical RM 48 16.2
 Endocervical RM 103 34.7
 Deep RM 51 17.2
RHi parameter
Surgical approach
 Laparotomy 168 56.6
 Laparoscopy 129 43.4
Residual disease 97 32.7
 Carcinoma in situ 23 23.7
 Invasive cancer 74 76.2
Tumor width, mean (range), mm: 14.0 ± 8.4 (0.2–4.0)
 ≤20 mm 233 78.5
 >20 mm 64 21.5
Depth of stromal invasion, mean (range), mm: 4.6 ± 2.4 (1–15)
 ≤5 mm 215 724
 >5 mm 82 27.6
LVSI 48 16.2
Vaginal invasion 4 1.3
Parametrial invasion 2 0.6
LNMj 15 5.1
 Pelvic 13 4.4
 Para-aortic 2 0.7
Positive RM 0 0

aClinically measurable tumors only; bSquamous cell carcinoma; cAdenocarcinoma; dAdenosquamous carcinoma; eCold knife cone; fLoop electrosurgical excision procedure; gLymphovascular space involvement; hResection margin; iRadical hysterectomy; jLymph node metastasis.