Skip to main content
. 2016 May 16;6:25952. doi: 10.1038/srep25952

Table 2. Summary of twelve SNPs and response to chemotherapy and overall survival.

ID No.a Gene location Alleles CR (%) MAF HWP P for responseb P for overall survivalc
dominant recessive additive dominant recessive additive
rs2297136 PD-L1 3′UTR TC 99.2 0.16 0.35 0.01 0.20 0.01 0.02 0.15 0.01
rs4143815 PD-L1 3′UTR CG 96.6 0.40 0.67 0.21 0.01 0.02 0.47 0.18 0.23
rs822336 PD-L1 promoter GC 99.5 0.26 0.73 0.67 0.11 0.31 0.68 0.95 0.72
rs822337 PD-L1 promoter TA 96.6 0.34 0.88 0.75 0.16 0.36 0.30 0.27 0.19
rs822338 PD-L1 intron CT 98.9 0.44 0.60 0.87 0.35 0.67 0.56 0.34 0.35
rs36084323 PD1 promoter GA 97.6 0.47 0.31 0.13 0.19 0.08 0.99 0.42 0.62
rs2227982 PD1 missence CT 98.9 0.46 0.15 0.20 0.09 0.07 0.96 0.53 0.74
rs10204525 PD1 3′UTR AG 99.2 0.25 0.38 0.33 0.09 0.15 0.76 0.60 0.66
rs231775 CTLA-4 missence GA 99.2 0.28 0.52 0.97 0.26 0.61 0.71 0.93 0.80
rs5742909 CTLA-4 promoter CT 97.9 0.12 0.26 0.41 0.58 0.58 0.98 0.11 0.74
rs733618 CTLA-4 promoter AG 98.7 0.45 0.91 0.37 0.80 0.47 0.46 0.70 0.48
rs11571316 CTLA-4 promoter CT 98.2 0.16 0.56 0.91 0.34 0.86 0.89 0.95 0.91

Abbreviation: CR, call rate; MAF, minor allele frequency; and HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

aInformation about SNPs and SNP ID were obtained from NCBI database (http://ncbi.nih.gov).

bP values were calculated by multivariate regression analysis, adjusted for age, gender, smoking status, tumor histology, stage, ECOG performance status, and weight loss.

cP-values were calculated using multivariate Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for age, gender, smoking status, tumor histology, stage, ECOG performance status, weight loss, 2nd line chemotherapy and radiation to primary tumor.