Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 1;4(3):441–455. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.306

Table 2.

Effect of unit operation of production on the trypsin inhibitor activity (TIA) in gbegiri a

Material Corresponding unit operation Source of gbegiri
IT93K‐452‐1 IT95K‐499s‐35 IT97K‐568‐18 Market sample (Ewa‐oloyin)
Trypsin inhibitor activity (TIU/g sample) Contributory reduction capacityb (%) Trypsin inhibitor activity (TIU/g sample) Contributory reduction capacity (%) Trypsin inhibitor activity (TIU/g sample) Contributory reduction capacity (%) Trypsin inhibitor activity (TIU/g sample) Contributory reduction capacity (%)
Raw cowpea 2523.4 ± 13.4c 2349.7 ± 9.8d 2638.5 ± 12.6b 2844.2 ± 11.7a
Preliminary soaked cowpea Preliminary soaking 2366.1 ± 6.2b 6.2 2152.4 ± 10.2d 8.4 2341.8 ± 8.5c 11.3 2679.1 ± 9.7a 5.8
Dehulled cowpea Dehulling 2111.5 ± 11.6b 10.1 1913.8 ± 6.6d 10.2 2084.2 ± 7.6c 9.8 2412.3 ± 5.5a 9.4
Pressure‐cooked dehulled cowpea Pressure cooking 0 83.7 0 81.4 0 79.0 0 84.8
Hot cowpea slurry Broom micronization 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gbegiri Further cooking 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Overall reduction in trypsin inhibitor activity of gbegiri (%) 100 100 100 100
a

Results are mean values of data from three different households ± standard deviation. Mean value within the same row having the same letter are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05.

b

Contributory reduction capacity (%) was calculated with respect to the initial total trypsin inhibitor activity (TIA) in the raw cowpea.