Table 3.

Software comparison in patients with or without regional perfusion heterogeneities

Perfusion	PMOD		FlowQuant
	Heterogeneous n = 20	Homogenous n = 28	Heterogeneous n = 20	Homogenous n = 28
Rest global LV MBF (mL/min/g)	0.87 ± 0.31	0.98 ± 0.37	0.94 ± 0.32*	1.08 ± 0.37*
Stress global LV MBF (mL/min/g)	1.98 ± 0.92	2.53 ± 0.82†	1.87 ± 0.78	2.43 ± 0.65†
Global LV MFR (unitless ratio)	2.35 ± 1.01	2.65 ± 0.63	1.98 ± 0.66‡	2.43 ± 0.61*,§,||

*PMOD vs FlowQuant in heterogeneous (P = .002) and homogeneous perfusion (P = .01); ^†Heterogeneous vs homogeneous perfusion with PMOD (P = .04) and FlowQuant (P = .009); ^‡PMOD vs FlowQuant in heterogeneous perfusion (P = .003); ^§PMOD vs FlowQuant in homogeneous perfusion (P = 0.01); ^||Heterogeneous vs homogeneous perfusion with FlowQuant (P = 0.02). LV, Left ventricle; MBF, myocardial blood flow; MFR, myocardial flow reserve