Skip to main content
. 2015 May 21;23:499–510. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0151-2

Table 4.

PMOD vs FlowQuant concordance correlation coefficients

n Pearson’s ρ [95% CI] ρc [95% CI] C b Reduced major axis PMOD = f (FQ)
Global left ventricle
 Rest MBF (mL/min/g) 48 0.95 [0.91–0.97] 0.93 [0.89–0.97] 0.98 y = 0.99x − 0.06
 Stress MBF (mL/min/g) 48 0.93 [0.88–0.96] 0.91 [0.86–0.95] 0.98 y = 1.18x − 0.29
 Stress + Rest MBF (mL/min/g) 96 0.97 [0.95–0.98] 0.96 [0.94–0.97] 0.99 y = 1.15x − 0.22
 MFR (unitless ratio) 48 0.83 [0.72–0.90] 0.76 [0.66–0.87] 0.92 y = 1.22x − 0.20
17-Segment level
 Rest MBF (mL/min/g) 816 0.81 [0.78–0.83] 0.79 [0.76–0.81] 0.97 y = 1.00x − 0.10
 Stress MBF (mL/min/g) 816 0.84 [0.82–0.86] 0.83 [0.81–0.85] 0.98 y = 1.23x − 0.49
 Stress + Rest MBF (mL/min/g) 1632 0.90 [0.90–0.91] 0.90 [0.89–0.90] 0.99 y = 1.15x − 0.28
 MFR (unitless ratio) 816 0.73 [0.70–0.76] 0.69 [0.66–0.73] 0.95 y = 1.25x − 0.33

ρ, Pearson’s correlation (precision); ρ c, Lin’s concordance correlation; C b, ρ c/ρ = bias correction factor (trueness); LV, left ventricle; MBF, myocardial blood flow; MFR, myocardial flow reserve