Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 16.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Dec 11;145(2):257–266. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.09.025

TABLE 1.

Demographics and Functional Outcome: The Difference in Visual Acuity at Baseline vs Weeks 24 and 48

Pt Dx Age (years) Gender Previous Treatments Duration (months) BL Wk 24 Wk 48 ΔWk 24 ΔWk 48
1 PM 57 F None 26 3 27 30 24 27
2 BCR 50 F PDT × 3 + Pegaptanib 16 33 47 39 14 6
3 PM 48 M PDT × 4 15 7 20 19 13 12
4 OHS 51 M Triamcinolone + PDT × 1 <1 14 55 50 41 36
5 AS 37 F PDT × 6 14 26 60 53 34 27
6 PM 23 F Pegaptanib 4 43 55 52 12 9
7 PM 48 F None 1 25 42 47 17 22
8 OHS 58 M Intravitreous Bevacizumab 4 38 49 47 11 9
9 PIC 41 M PDT × 3 3 23 63 55 40 32
10 PIC 33 F Triamcinolone 6 31 40 50 9 19
Mean 24.30 45.80 44.20
Median 25.50 48.00 48.50

PM = pathologic myopia; BCR = birdshot chorioretinopathy; OHS = ocular histoplasmosis syndrome; AS = angioid streaks; PDT = photodynamic therapy; PIC = punctate inner choroidopathy. Demographic information is shown for each patient (Pt) including: the diagnosis age, gender, previous treatments, and duration of choroidal neovascularization at baseline. The functional outcome is the number of ETDRS letters read at 4 meters at baseline (BL), week 24 (Wk 24), and Wk 48, and the difference in letters read between Wk 24 and baseline (ΔWk 24; the primary outcome measure) or Wk 48 and baseline (ΔWk 48).

Boldface indicates the change in visual acuity from baseline.