Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Biochem Biophys. 2016 Mar 29;597:30–47. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2016.03.030

Table 5. Male dw11 HF genes-conservation in female dw 36 mice.

Stimulation
HFD/LFD
Gene WT Male dw 11 WT Female dw 36
Aldh1a1 2.0 2.9
Apol7a 2.1 n.c.
Arrdc3 3.5 2.1
Car8 2.5 n.c.
Chpt1 2.1 1.6
Cyp2c54 7.4 2.3
Cyp2e1 3.9 1.7
Cyp51 2.1 -1.6
Dars 2.0 n.c.
Dbp 3.7 87.0
Dnaja1 2.3 -1.7
Herpud1 3.4 1.7
Hmgcs1 2.2 -2.0
Hpgd 2.0 1.5
Nrli3 3.0 1.5
Oat 2.2 2.2
Suppression
HFD/LFD
Gene WT Male dw 11 WT Female dw 36
Acacb -3.2 -1.9
Apcs -2.4 -2.1
Arhgef16 -3.1 -2.3
Btg3 -3.0 -3.1
Capg -2.0 n.c.
Car2 -2.2 -2.5
Cd34 -2.7 -3.3
Cdt1 -2.2 1.5
Cd9 -4.3 -6.6
Cdkn3c -2.0 n.c.
Cdt1 -2.2 +1.5
Chka -2.5 -10.7
Cotl1 -2.0 -1.8
Fndc3b -2.5 -2.5
Gadd45g -4.8 -3.4
Gpi1 -2.0 -3.7
Gram24 -2.4 -2.1
Icam1 -3.1 n.c.
Igh-Vj -6.1 -3.2
Lpl -3.3 -1.8
Ly6d -4.3 -1.8
Nr4a1 -3.5 n.c.
Nupr1 -5.5 -3.7
Rbp1 -2.5 -1.9
Scd2 -4.5 -7.9
Socs3 -2.1 -1.4
Tff3 -6.4 -3.6
Tmem51 -2.4 -2.0
Slc6a8 -3.0 -2.8
Slc7a7 -2.4 -2.7

Data represents fold change.

Male (n=3) mice were fed the diets for 11 weeks post-weaning.

Female (n=2) mice were fed the diets for 36 weeks post-weaning.

Expression levels are calculated relative to WT LFD males and females, respectively.

n.c. represents no change (FC<±1.5).