Skip to main content
. 2016 May 16;10:32. doi: 10.1186/s13065-016-0177-9

Table 2.

Analysis of variance for central composite design and tests of the regression coefficients and intercepts of coded equations for curdione, furanodienone, curcumol and germacrone

Source Mean squares F p value Coefficient estimate
Curdione Model 0.075 12.99 0.0014
Intercept 1.790
X 1 0.360 61.88 0.0001 0.160
X 2 0.120 20.88 0.0026 0.094
X 3 0.042 7.29 0.0307 0.056
X 1 X 2 0.029 5.04 0.0596 −0.060
X 1 X 3 1.326 × 10−3 0.23 0.6466 −0.013
X 2 X 3 8.001 × 10−3 1.38 0.2779 0.032
X 21 4.588 × 10−3 0.79 0.4027 −0.020
X 22 0.110 19.80 0.0030 −0.100
X 23 3.531 × 10−3 0.61 0.4601 −0.018
Lack of Fit 6.474 × 10−3 1.60 0.4281
R 2 = 0.9435, Q 2 = 0.8677, Adeq Precision = 12.121
Furanodienone Model 0.098 27.14 0.0001
Intercept 1.370
X 1 0.330 90.16 <0.0001 0.150
X 2 0.190 51.54 0.0002 0.120
X 3 0.110 29.00 0.0010 0.088
X 1 X 2 9.730 × 10−3 2.69 0.1452 −0.035
X 1 X 3 1.966 × 10−3 0.54 0.4852 −0.013
X 2 X 3 1.566 × 10−4 0.04 0.8412 4.425 × 10−3
X 21 0.025 7.01 0.0331 −0.047
X 22 0.250 70.00 <0.0001 −0.150
X 23 0.015 4.14 0.0813 −0.036
Lack of Fit 3.853 × 10−3 1.27 0.4963
R 2 = 0.9721, Q 2 = 0.9117, Adeq Precision = 16.176
Curcumol Model 2.694 × 10−3 15.43 0.0008
Intercept 0.210
X 1 8.931 × 10−3 51.15 0.0002 0.026
X 2 4.953 × 10−3 28.37 0.0011 0.019
X 3 2.519 × 10−3 14.43 0.0067 0.014
X 1 X 2 1.739 × 10−4 1.00 0.3515 −4.663 × 10−3
X 1 X 3 9.453 × 10−5 0.54 0.4858 3.437 × 10−3
X 2 X 3 9.045 × 10−5 0.52 0.4950 3.362 × 10−3
X 21 3.674 × 10−7 2.10 × 10−3 0.9647 −1.805 × 10−4
X 22 6.848 × 10−3 39.22 0.0004 −0.025
X 23 2.553 × 10−4 1.46 0.2658 −4.759 × 10−3
Lack of Fit 2.209 × 10−4 3.76 0.2232
R 2 = 0.9520, Q 2 = 0.8957, Adeq Precision = 14.233
Germacrone Model 7.756 × 10−3 16.36 0.0007
Intercept 0.350
X 1 0.023 49.39 0.0002 0.041
X 2 0.010 21.15 0.0025 0.027
X 3 9.435 × 10−3 19.90 0.0029 0.026
X 1 X 2 8.694 × 10−4 1.83 0.2178 −0.010
X 1 X 3 9.940 × 10−5 0.21 0.6609 3.525 × 10−3
X 2 X 3 1.682 × 10−5 0.04 0.8559 1.450 × 10−3
X 21 7.945 × 10−4 1.68 0.2365 −8.395 × 10−3
X 22 0.025 52.89 0.0002 −0.047
X 23 4.873 × 10−4 1.03 0.3444 −6.574 × 10−3
Lack of Fit 6.264 × 10−4 6.72 0.1346
R 2 = 0.9546, Q 2 = 0.9076, Adeq Precision = 13.465

X 1 Liquid to solid ratio (mL g−1); X 2 Ethanol concentration (%); X 3 Ultrasonic time (min)