Table 5. Performance comparison of different feature selection methods on independent test set.
Species | Selection Methods | MCC | ACC | SEN | SPE | PRE | AUC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H. sapiens | MRMD | 0.180 | 0.591 | 0.667 | 0.511 | 0.592 | 0.625 |
mRMR | 0.196 | 0.599 | 0.652 | 0.542 | 0.603 | 0.632 | |
MI | 0.230 | 0.616 | 0.690 | 0.538 | 0.614 | 0.653 | |
PCC | 0.257 | 0.629 | 0.696 | 0.558 | 0.626 | 0.657 | |
M. musculus | MRMD | 0.255 | 0.627 | 0.670 | 0.584 | 0.621 | 0.686 |
mRMR | 0.303 | 0.651 | 0.660 | 0.643 | 0.653 | 0.705 | |
MI | 0.206 | 0.603 | 0.601 | 0.605 | 0.608 | 0.683 | |
PCC | 0.314 | 0.657 | 0.648 | 0.665 | 0.663 | 0.713 | |
E. coli | MRMD | 0.394 | 0.696 | 0.745 | 0.647 | 0.679 | 0.698 |
mRMR | 0.257 | 0.627 | 0.686 | 0.569 | 0.614 | 0.689 | |
MI | 0.137 | 0.569 | 0.608 | 0.529 | 0.564 | 0.598 | |
PCC | 0.375 | 0.686 | 0.745 | 0.627 | 0.667 | 0.734 | |
S. typhimurium | MRMD | 0.062 | 0.530 | 0.640 | 0.420 | 0.525 | 0.561 |
mRMR | -0.201 | 0.490 | 0.620 | 0.360 | 0.492 | 0.503 | |
MI | 0.081 | 0.540 | 0.600 | 0.480 | 0.536 | 0.508 | |
PCC | 0.040 | 0.520 | 0.560 | 0.480 | 0.519 | 0.542 |