If attraction is a singular motor program, then we would expect other motor programs to scale with the level of attraction. We examine the linear correlations between these parameters for a fly’s response to ACV0. (A) On a fly-by-fly basis, time to return is uncorrelated with time spent inside implying that these two programs are independent. Line represent the best linear fit to data. (B) Same data as in A but normalized to show fractional change in the two parameter. Line represent the best linear fit to data. (C) Cross-covariance between the parameters in our 17-parameter description of behavior show that most parameters are not significantly correlated (left). Only 15 out 136 pairwise comparisons are significantly correlated (right). 1. attraction index, 2. time inside/transit, 3. time to return, 4. radial density, 5. speed in, 6. speed out, 7. speed crossing in, 8. speed crossing out, 9. run duration, 10. stop duration, 11. run probability in, 12. run probability out, 13. angular speed in, 14. angular speed out, 15. smooth turns in, 16. smooth turns out, 17. sharp turn at odor bounary.