Skip to main content
. 2016 May;14(3):253–261. doi: 10.1370/afm.1935

Table 4.

Known Group Analysis Based on Characteristics of Patients and Practices

Practice Activationa Experiences of Safety Problemsb Impact on Health (Health Domain Specific)b Impact on Health Care, Personal Care, and Financial Needsb Overall Rating of Patient Safetya
Patient characteristics, β (95%CI)c
Number of long-term conditions 0.49 (0.53–0.93) 1.58 (0.82–2.35) 0.88 (0.36–1.40) 0.11 (−0.42 to 0.64)
Number of medications 0.03 (−0.34 to 0.39) 0.14 (−0.6 to 0.33) 0.65 (0.13–1.16) 0.49 (0.19–0.80) 0.17 (−0.17 to 0.53)
English as a second language
 Yes (n = 87) 1 1 1 1 1
 No (n = 1,118) 5.71 (0.57–10.86) −4.37 (−8.30 to −0.44) −2.83 (−7.65 to 1.98) 7.87 (2.95–12.80) −4.67(−10.36 to 1.02)
Born in the UK
 Yes (n = 1,093) 1 1 1 1 1
 No (n = 112) −2.46 (−6.95 to 2.03) 2.83 (−0.02 to 5.68) 1.48 (−2.38 to 5.34) −5.13 (−8.64 to −1.63) 3.13 (−0.19 to 6.47)
Practice characteristics, r (95%CI)d
Practice size 0.24 (−0.06 to 0.50) −0.27 (−0.52 to 0.03) −0.11 (−0.40 to 0.19) −0.02 (−0.31 to 0.28) 0.01 (−0.20 to 0.39)
Proportion of patients aged >65 years 0.06 (−0.25 to 0.35) −0.08 (−0.37 to 0.22) −0.07 (−0.36 to 0.24) −0.04 (−0.34 to 0.26) 0.14 (−0.16 to 0.42)
Deprivation scoree −0.32 (−0.56 to −0.02) 0.30 (0.00–0.55) 0.20 (−0.10 to 0.47) 0.18 (−0.13 to 0.45) −0.36 (−0.60 to −0.07)
Safety Climatef −0.09 (−0.45 to 0.29) 0.06 (−0.32 to 0.42) 0.10 (−0.28 to 0.46) 0.15 (−0.50 to 0.25) 0.07 (−0.31 to 0.43)
a

Higher scores indicate perception of safer practices.

b

Higher scores indicate more severe/frequent access problems or more severe harm.

c

Bivariate linear regression.

d

Correlation coefficient.

e

Deprivation measured using the Index of Multiple Deprivation; higher scores indicate higher deprivation levels.

f

Safety climate measured using the instrument “PC-SafeQuest” (information available only from 31 practices).