Table 2.
Mean scores, correlations and mean differences between the EDE-Q and EDE on eating-disorder psychopathology variables.
| EDE-Q M (SD) |
EDE M (SD) |
r | p | t | n | p | ηp2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLACK SAMPLE (n = 119) | ||||||||
| Original Global Score | 3.38 (1.03) | 2.77 (0.89) | .643 | <.001 | 8.12 | 119 | <.001 | .359 |
| Restraint | 1.99 (1.52) | 1.82 (1.25) | .491* | <.001 | 1.29 | 119 | .200 | .014 |
| Eating | 3.01 (1.49) | 2.01 (1.32) | .496 | <.001 | 7.73 | 119 | <.001 | .336 |
| Weight | 3.92 (1.14) | 3.29 (1.04) | .631 | <.001 | 7.30 | 119 | <.001 | .311 |
| Shape | 4.61 (1.13) | 3.97 (1.17) | .649 | <.001 | 7.24 | 119 | <.001 | .308 |
| Brief Global Score | 3.75 (1.25) | 3.43 (1.17) | .559 | <.001 | 3.07 | 119 | .003 | .074 |
| Restraint a | 2.54 (1.92) | 2.55 (1.83) | .391a | <.001 | −0.16a | 119 | .870 | n/a |
| Overvaluation a | 4.00 (1.96) | 3.58 (1.85) | .367a | <.001 | 2.12a | 119 | .034 | n/a |
| Dissatisfaction a | 5.27 (1.33) | 4.58 (1.16) | .385a | <.001 | 5.82a | 119 | <.001 | n/a |
|
| ||||||||
| WHITE SAMPLE (n = 119) | ||||||||
| Original Global Score | 3.62 (1.11) | 2.86 (0.96) | .764 | <.001 | 11.49 | 119 | <.001 | .528 |
| Restraint | 2.32 (1.52) | 1.86 (1.39) | .663 | <.001 | 4.19 | 119 | <.001 | .129 |
| Eating | 3.34 (1.46) | 2.22 (1.38) | .557 | <.001 | 9.12 | 119 | <.001 | .414 |
| Weight | 4.06 (1.14) | 3.36 (1.11) | .646 | <.001 | 8.12 | 119 | <.001 | .358 |
| Shape | 4.75 (1.11) | 3.99 (1.15) | .732 | <.001 | 9.92 | 119 | <.001 | .455 |
| Brief Global Score | 4.27 (1.20) | 3.57 (1.20) | .693 | <.001 | 8.18 | 119 | <.001 | .362 |
| Restraint a | 3.04 (1.99) | 2.58 (1.93) | .474a | <.001 | 2.64a | 119 | .008 | n/a |
| Overvaluation a | 4.73 (1.62) | 3.79 (1.84) | .410a | <.001 | 5.43a | 119 | <.001 | n/a |
| Dissatisfaction a | 5.66 (0.73) | 4.82 (1.14) | .273a | <.001 | 7.03a | 119 | <.001 | n/a |
Note. EDE-Q = Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire, EDE = Eating Disorder Examination.
Kendall’s τb instead of Pearson’s correlation and Wilcoxon Z instead of paired t-test statistics due to non-normality.
Significantly different (p < .05) from White r, however, this became non-significant using a Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons.