Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 18;2(1):e13. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.5366

Table 2.

Stage of pregnancy at which active participants were recruited to the study (SOP, stage of pregnancy, participants recruited in the second or third trimesters had reached at least 13-weeks’ gestation)

SOP Denmark Netherlands Poland United Kingdom All Locations

n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
First trimester 309 (48.4%) 48 (10.1%) 48 (19.9%) 70 (9.9%) 475 (23.0%)a

≤4/40 58 (9.1%) 2 (0.4%) 3 (1.2%) 0 (0.0%) 63 (3.1%)

5/40 53 (8.3%) 0 (0.0%) 4 (1.7%) 4 (0.6%) 61 (3.0%)

6/40 53 (8.3%) 2 (0.4%) 5 (2.1%) 4 (0.6%) 64 (3.1%)

7/40 37 (5.8%) 2 (0.4%) 5 (2.1%) 2 (0.3%) 46 (2.2%)

8/40 29 (4.5%) 4 (0.8%) 8 (3.3%) 7 (1.0%) 48 (2.3%)

9/40 23 (3.6%) 15 (3.2%) 0 (0.0%) 14 (2.0%) 52 (2.5%)

10/40 21 (3.3%) 9 (1.9%) 4 (1.7%) 8 (1.1%) 42 (2.0%)

11/40 20 (3.1%) 6 (1.3%) 9 (3.7%) 15 (2.1%) 50 (2.4%)

12/40 15 (2.4%) 8 (1.7%) 10 (4.2%) 16 (2.3%) 49 (2.4%)
Second/third trimester 330 (51.6%) 428 (89.9%) 193 (80.1%) 639 (90.1%) 1590 (77.0%)
Total 639 (100.0%) 476 (100.0%) 241 (100.0%) 709 (100.0%) 2065 (100.0%)

aPoisson regression (P<.001) identifies a significant difference between the four study locations in the proportion of first trimester participants recruited driven by the high proportion of Danish participants recruited in the first trimester.