Skip to main content
. 2016 May 17;18:52. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0709-1

Table 3.

Stability of the mutant allele

Fragment analysis MiSeq (VAF)
Donor RIND score Ratio peak height (mutant/WT allele) cDNA cDNAp gDNA Evidence for NMD?
M01 c.1A > G 3 0.7 (0.6–0.8) 49 (42–55) 52 (51–52) 49 (49–49) No
M02 c.1A > C 2 / / / / No
M03 c.212 + 3A > G 2 / / / / No
M04 c.1961del 0 0.4 (0.4–0.4) 29 (25–33) 47 (43–51) 47 (47–47) Yes
M05 c.2359dup 3 0.6 (0.6–0.6) 28 (25–31) 42 (38–45) 48 (48–48) Yes
M06 c.2359dup 2 0.5 (0.5–0.5) 24 (23–25) 44 (41–47) 50 (50–50) Yes
M07 c.2359dup 0 0.4 (0.4–0.5) 29 (27–30) 48 (30–67) 57 (55–59) Yes
M08 c.2359dup 4 / / / / Yes
M09 c.3331_3334del 1 0.4 (0.4–0.4) 25 (18–31) 44 (34–48) 49 (49–49) Yes
M10 c.3481_3491del 2 0.4 (0.4–0.4) 23 (16–30) 42 (28–52) 39 (32–46)a Yes
M11 c.3481_3491del 1 0.4 (0.3–0.5) 23 (16–32) 41 (23–54) 39 (34–44)a Yes
M12 c.3481_3491del 2 0.4 (0.4–0.4) 26 (16–34) 39 (28–50) 42 (35–49)a Yes
M13 c.3661G > T 1 0.5 (0.3–0.6) 29 (28–30) 50 (41–57) 50 (46–53) Yes
M14 c.3661G > T 0 0.4 (0.3–0.4) 31 (29–32) 52 (52–52) 50 (50–50) Yes
M15 c.3661G > T 0 / / / / Yes
M16 c.4327C > T 3 0.5 (0.5–0.6) 24 (21–27) 51 (45–56) / Yes
M17 c.4327C > T 3 0.6 (0.4–0.7) 26 (21–30) 48 (44–53) 50 (50–50) Yes
M18 c.4931_4393delinsTT 0 0.4 (0.3–0.4) 30 (28–31) 37 (28–47) 52 (52–52) Yes

cDNA complementary DNA, cDNAp cDNA extracted in the presence of puromycin, gDNA genomic DNA, NMD nonsense mediated decay, RIND radiosensitivity indicator, VAF variant allele frequency, WT wild type

aVAF <50 % for gDNA