Skip to main content
. 2016 May 17;16:185. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1409-3

Table 10.

Differential discounting results for CVD risk without and with diabetes for four risk levels. All dominated strategies have been excluded

Base case Lower DR No DR Base case Lower DR No DR
Strategy oDR - 3 % oDR - 1.5 % oDR - 0 % Strategy oDR - 3 % oDR - 1.5 % oDR - 0 %
CVD risk
Low risk ICER Moderate risk ICER
  No treatment No treatment
  ACEI_Diu 1327 907 585 ACEI_Diu 164 118 082
  ACEI_Diu_Sta 3175 2121 1497 ACEI_Diu_Sta 554 379 262
High risk Very high risk
  No treatment No treatment
  ACEI_CCB_Diu 349 252 176 ACEI_CCB_Diu_ASA 498 364 258
  ACEI_CCB_Diu_Sta 607 432 293 ACEI_CCB_Diu_Sta_ASA 652 461 315
CVD risk with diabetes
Low risk Moderate risk
  No treatment No treatment
  Sulf_ACEI_CCB 608 465 311 Sulf_ACEI_CCB 115 083 058
  Big_Sulf_ACEI_CCB 958 645 430 Big_Sulf_ACEI_CCB 256 179 123
  Big_Sulf_ACEI_CCB_Sta 2480 1769 1126 Big_Sulf_ACEI_CCB_Sta 945 675 450
High risk Very high risk
  No treatment No treatment
  Big_Sulf_ACEI_CCB 309 222 154 Big_Sulf_ACEI_CCB_ASA 350 258 184
  Big_Sulf_ACEI_CCB_Sta 914 640 436 Big Sulf ACEI CCB Sta ASA 704 505 346
  Big Sulf ACEI ARB CCB Sta 10300 7357 4905 Big Sulf ACEI ARB CCB Sta ASA 7615 4950 3536

DR - Discount rate; ICER - Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio