Skip to main content
. 2016 May 17;16:185. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1409-3

Table 7.

Summary of meta-analyses and individual trials from which intervention effects were extracted

Drug class Trials Drug names Comparator Type Blinded Statistical method Notes
ACEI 3 Ramipril, Deserpidine, Placebo MA Double* RR, M-H, fixed, Chi2 72 % PP
Perindopril, Captopril
ARB 17 Cardisartan, Valsartan, Placebo MA NR~ RR, random, fixed, I2 NR
Irbesartan, Telmisartan, Lorsartan
ASA 6 Soluble aspirin Placebo1 MA Blindedƪ Rate ratio, NS, X 2 PP trials only
BB 5 Propanolol, Atenolol Placebo MA Double§ RR, M-H, fixed, Chi2 72 % PP
Big 1 Metformin Conventional therapy RCTs No NA NA
CCB 22▪ NR Placebo MA Double† RR, M-H, fixed, Chi2 NR
Diu 19 Indapamide, CHTD, Chlorothiazide, Placebo MA Double¶ RR, M-H, fixed, Chi2 72 % PP
HCTZ, Bendrofluazide, T richloromethiazide
Sta 10 Pravastatin, Lovastatin, Placebo,UC2 or diet3 MA Double‡ OR, random, fixed, I2 80 % PP or separate note on PP
Artorvastatin, Simvastatin, Rosuvastatin
Sulf 1 Sulfonylureas-insulin Conventional therapy RCTs No NA NA

ACEI - Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor, ARB - Angiotensin Receptor Blocker, Asp - Soluble Aspirin, BB - Beta Blocker, Big - Biguanide, CCB - Calcium Channel Blocker, Diu - Diuretic, Sta - Statins, Sulf - Sulfonylureas, CHTD - Chlorothalidone, HCTZ - Hydrochlorothiazide, UC - usual care, MA - Meta analyses, RCTs - Randomized Controlled Trials, NR - Not reported, RR - Relative risk, M-H - Mantel Haenszel, OR - Odds ratio, PP - Primary prevention, SP - Secondary prevention, NA - Not applicable, 22▪ - These are trials which reported MI events; 9 reported stroke events, Double* - two trials were open label, NR ~ − Even though blinding was not reported it was considered in trial quality, Placebo1 - Two trials compared aspirin with no comparator and open-label vitamin E, Blindedƪ - Two trials were open trials, Double§ - One trial was single blinded and one open trial, Double† - One trial was not blinded, Double¶ - Four trials were single blinded and three trials were open, Double‡ - Blinding status was not reported for one trial. For those drug classes which were not compared with placebo, we assume that comparability between different drug classes remains valid since a non- pharmacological agent was used. Ideally a mixed treatment comparison analysis should have been performed with all the drug classes whose comparator was not a placebo