Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 17.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2006 Sep 26;45(38):11703–11711. doi: 10.1021/bi0607498

Table 2.

Statistics of data collection and refinement.

Complex E. coli: GDP•2′-deoxy-6-PIMP•hadacidin Mouse muscle: GDP•2′-deoxy-6-PIMP
Space group P3221 P43212
Unit cell parameters:
a (Å) 80.59 70.11
b (Å) 80.59 70.11
c (Å) 158.5 199.0
Resolution limits (Å) 25–2.0 16–2.4
No. of reflections collected 285,758 244,020
No. of unique reflections 39,551 20,371
Completeness of data (%), overall/last shella 96.4/78.5 98.9/98.9
Rmergeb, overall/last shella 0.055/0.265 0.100/0.415
No. of refls. In refinementc 39,498 19,121
No. of atoms 3,384 3,408
No. of solvent sites 169 128
R/Rfreed 0.224/0.251 0.198/0.262
Mean B values (Å2):
 Protein 38 35
 Ligands 36 27
Root mean square deviations:
 Bond lengths(Å) 0.006 0.006
 Bond angles(°) 1.3 1.2
 Dihedral angles(°) 23 23
 Improper dihedral angles(°) 0.83 0.85
a

Resolution range for the last shell is 2.0–2.07 Å for the E. coli complex and 2.4–2.5 Å for mouse muscle complex.

b

RmergejΣi|Iij−<Ij>|/ΣiΣjIij, where i runs over multiple observations of the same intensity and j runs over crystallographically unique intensities.

c

All data for which |Fobs|>0.

d

R-factor=Σ||Fobs|−|Fcalc||/Σ|Fobs|, |Fobs|>0.