Skip to main content
. 2016 May 12;11:603–613. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S100255

Table 5.

Percent change and logistic regression models predicting moderate and pronounced cognitive improvement after cochlear implantation

Test Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Change in speechscore P-value (significantif P<0.0015) Change in speechscore P-value (significantif P<0.0075) Change in speech score (bi-modal testinga) P-value (significantif P<0.0075) Change in speech score P-value (significant if P<0.0075)
TOPF 9.81* (1.02 to 18.60) 0.0286 11.91** (3.83 to 19.99) 0.0039 13.53** (5.73 to 21.33) 0.0007 11.13* (1.96 to 20.31) 0.0174
WASI-VIQ 10.31* (2.39 to 18.24) 0.0108 12.20** (6.14 to 18.26) 0.0001 11.62** (5.75 to 17.50) 0.0001 12.43** (5.68 to 19.17) 0.0003
WASI-PIQ 5.11 (−1.78 to 12.01) 0.1461 3.45 (−3.35 to 10.24) 0.3200 5.51* (−0.47 to 11.48) 0.0707 4.77 (−1.42 to 10.97) 0.1306
WASI-FSIQ 9.78* (2.78 to 16.77) 0.0061 10.68** (4.03 to 17.34) 0.0016 12.16** (5.89 to 18.43) 0.0001 11.60** (4.70 to 18.50) 0.0009
Vocabulary 8.47* (2.26 to 14.69) 0.0076 10.22** (4.75 to 15.69) 0.0003 11.09** (5.71 to 16.46) 0.0001 9.85** (3.40 to 16.29) 0.0028
Similarities 12.66* (−2.20 to 27.52) 0.0949 14.42* (1.27 to 27.57) 0.0316 15.45** (3.50 to 27.40) 0.0113 18.62* (−2.69 to 39.92) 0.0867
Matrix Reasoning 6.27* (−0.46 to 12.99) 0.068 7.31* (0.83 to 13.78) 0.0270 9.75** (3.94 to 15.57) 0.0010 7.40* (−0.68 to 15.49) 0.0727
BNT 6.43 (−2.01 to 14.88) 0.1353 10.23** (2.89 to 17.57) 0.0063 8.14* (−0.31 to 16.59) 0.0591 7.84* (−0.27 to 15.95) 0.0579
Picture Naming 3.07 (−3.57 to 9.72) 0.3646 5.41* (−0.25 to 11.08) 0.0611 2.37 (−3.81 to 8.55) 0.4519 5.38** (3.58 to 7.18) 0
List Learning 6.27* (1.04 to 11.50) 0.0187 5.25* (−0.35 to 10.85) 0.0663 5.10* (−0.79 to 10.99) 0.0899 6.65** (2.19 to 11.12) 0.0035
List Recall 5.64 (−2.69 to 13.97) 0.1848 7.76* (−0.13 to 15.65) 0.0537 8.76* (0.81 to 16.70) 0.0309 3.23 (−6.53 to 12.98) 0.5166

Notes: P-value significance thresholds: to correct for the possible inflation in type I error due to multiple comparisons, significance cannot be compared to a level of 0.05. Instead, P-values are statistically significant if they are lower than the P-value threshold shown for each year. This assumes a false positive rate of 5% (ie, 5% of significant results may still be due to type I error).

*

Significance reached without adjustment for type I error inflation.

**

Significance persistent after adjustment for type I error inflation.

a

In the bimodal condition, patients were tested with their cochlear implant in one ear and a best-fit hearing aid in the contralateral ear.

Abbreviations: BNT, Boston Naming Test; TOPF, Test of Premorbid Functioning; WASI, Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence; -VIQ, Verbal Intelligence Quotient; -PIQ, Performance Intelligence Quotient; -FSIQ, Full Scale Intelligence Quotient.