Skip to main content
. 2016 May 11;12:1173–1180. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S105476

Table 2.

Significant differences between activity of groups

Contrast SEM F P-value
Image 1 −5.903 7.413 0.63 0.425
Image 2 −15.482 7.413 4.36 0.036
Image 3 32.739 7.413 19.50 0.000
Image 4 20.325 7.413 7.52 0.006
Image 5 31.468 7.413 18.02 0.000
Image 6 15.682 7.448 4.43 0.035
Image 7 −4.576 7.448 0.38 0.539
Image 8 17.266 7.413 5.42 0.020
Image 9 11.942 7.413 2.60 0.107
Image 10 −17.503 7.438 5.54 0.018
Image 11 −9.524 7.520 1.60 0.205
Image 12 −10.032 7.413 1.83 0.176
Image 13 −0.011 7.413 0.00 0.998
Image 14 13.575 7.413 3.35 0.067
Image 15 8.929 7.413 1.45 0.228

Notes: Lower HEG activity of university students (n=70) versus higher HEG activity of adolescents (n=59) according to images of each set. Two-way ANOVA with interaction between sample and images for HEG activity. Model F(31,2017)=5.05, P=0.000; sample F(1,2017)=9.19, P=0.002; images F(15,2017)=5.10, P=0.000; sample#images F(15,2017)=34.49, P=0.000. Bold values represent statistically significant results.

Abbreviations: HEG, hemoencephalography; SEM, standard error of mean; ANOVA, analysis of variance.