. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 17.

Published in final edited form as: J Community Health. 2015 Aug;40(4):744–749. doi: 10.1007/s10900-015-9993-4

Table 3.

The role of motive dimensions in youth’s smoking and drinking (multiple logistic regression analyses) (n = 500)

Motive dimension	BOYS (n = 170)		GIRLS (n = 330)
Motive dimension	SMOKING OR (95 % CI)	DRINKING OR (95 % CI)	SMOKING OR (95 % CI)	DRINKING OR (95 % CI)
Social	1.21 (.98–1.50)	1.20 (1.03–1.50)^*	1.12 (1.04–1.27)^**	1.49 (1.31–1.70)^***
Self-enhancement	.92 (.72–1.17)	1.12 (1.00–1.52)	1.01 (.87–1.16)	1.04 (.93–1.16)
Boredom relief	1.31 (1.09–1.65)^**	.90 (.60–1.34)	1.05 (.88–1.26)	.91 (.89–1.08)
Affect regulation	1.11 (1.05–1.27)^**	.98 (.83–1.69)	1.19 (1.08–1.31)^***	1.01 (.90–1.14)
Socioeconomic variables
Father’s schooling (2 = college/university, 1 = less)	1.33 (.40–4.44)	.80 (.26–2.44)	2.24 (.83–6.11)	2.45 (1.11–5.38)^*
Mother’s schooling (2 = college/university, 1 = less)	.22 (.06–.77)^*	.50 (.44–1.34)	.55 (.20–1.50)	.18 (.07–.42)^***
χ²	41.30^***	32.82^***	43.20^***	115.66^***
df	6	6	6	6
Nagelkerke R²	.45	.34	.29	.46

OR odds ratio

95 % CI 95 % confidence intervals

p < .05;

^**

p < .01;

^***

p < .001