Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2016 Mar 2;9(5):357–366. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-15-0350

Table 2.

Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for CIN 2+, CIN 3, and 8-OH status according to cervical mucosa community type

Community type Partition 1 Partition 2 Partition 3 Partition 4
π (θ)* 0.15 (7.74) 0.41 (89.78) 0.16 (282.98) 0.28 (55.59)
CIN 2+ vs. CIN 1
Total number (% CIN 2+) 62 (73%) 170 (81%) 68 (87%) 119 (76%)
Unadjusted model 1.00 1.63 (0.83; 3.21) 2.48 (1.01; 6.07) 1.17 (0.58; 2.36)
Multivariable model† 1.00 1.84 (0.86; 3.93) 3.48 (1.27; 9.55) 1.13 (0.51; 2.52)
CIN 3+ vs. CIN 1
Total number (% CIN 3) 34 (50%) 78 (59%) 32 (72%) 65 (55%)
Unadjusted model 1.00 1.44 (0.64; 3.23) 2.55 (0.92; 7.10) 1.24 (0.54; 2.85)
Multivariable model 1.00 1.68 (0.66; 4.28) 3.24 (0.98; 10.68) 1.20 (0.45; 3.20)
8-OHdG (>38.8% vs. <=38.8%, median)
Total number (% above median 8-OHdG) 30 (40%) 42 (57%) 27 (63%) 57 (44%)
Unadjusted model 1.00 2.00 (0.77; 5.18) 2.55 (0.88; 7.43) 1.17 (0.48; 2.88)
Multivariable model 1.00 2.23 (0.82; 6.07) 2.61 (0.85; 8.03) 1.42 (0.53; 3.79)

Abbreviations: CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; 8-OHdG, 8 hydroxy deoxyguanosine.

Notes: Partitioning of samples was performed using the Dirichlet multinomial mixture model (cite) as implemented in Mothur v1.35 (cite).

*

π reflects proportion of samples clustered to the community type. θ reflects variance with small values reflecting greater variation.

Adjusted for age, BMI, race, education, parity, hormonal contraceptive use and smoking status.

Adjusted for age, BMI, race, education, parity, hormonal contraceptive use, smoking status, and CIN status.