Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 31;25(2):121–127. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1570118

Table 2. Comparison between the population of enrolled patients with VSPV and the group of VSPV patients to be treated with MPFF.

Characteristics of patients with VSPV Enrolled subjects (N = 48) Men (N = 30) Women (N = 18) MPFF group (N = 24) Men (N = 17) Women (N = 7) p-Value
Mean age (y) 51.5 53.9 47.7 55.8 54.1 56.6 0.301
Mean time since thrombotic event (y) 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.9 3.9 4.0 0.232
Location of dilated VSPV, N (%) NS
Left side 22 (46) 9 (30) 13 (72) 11 (46) 6 (35) 5 (72) 1.000
Right side 7 (15) 4 (13) 3 (17) 3 (12) 2 (12) 1 (14) 0.833
Bilateral 19 (39) 17 (57) 2 (11) 10 (42) 9 (53) 1 (14) 0.912
Of which, contralateral 0 0 0 0 0 0
Degree of dilation, N (%) NS
Grade 1 (5–6 mm) 13 (27) 10 (33) 3 (17) 2 (10) 1 (50) 1 (50) 0.124
Grade 2 (7–9 mm) 28 (58) 17 (57) 11 (61) 20 (80) 14 (70) 6 (30) 0.353
Grade 3 (≥ 9 mm) 7 (15) 3 (10) 4 (22) 2 (10) 2 (100) 0 (0) 0.501
Mean diameter, mm (95% CI) 7.64 (5.47–10.93) 7.20 (5.03–10.49) 7.91 (5.44–15.83) 7.59 (5.04–9.70) 7.52 (5.04–9.70) 7.79 (5.83–9.19)
Retrograde blood flow, N (% patients) 35 (73) 21 (70) 14 (78) 16 (67) 12 (71) 4 (57) 0.819

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; MPFF, micronized purified flavonoid fraction; VSPV, varicose small pelvic veins.