Table 3.
Summary of previous studies investigating the effects of hormone therapy on intraocular pressure
Study | Average Age | Population Demographics and Sample Size | Hormone(s) Administered | Main Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|
Interventional studies | ||||
Treister, 1970 | 37–55 yrs (average age not available) | 45 non-glaucomatous women | Mestranol 0.1 mg (n = 15) vs. mestranol and progestin ethynodiol diacetate 1 mg (n = 15) vs. placebo (n = 15) | Significantly lower IOP (2 mmHg) at 6 mos in mestranol group. Combining ethynodiol had no additional effect on IOP. |
Sator, 1997 | 56 yrs | 25 non-glaucomatous women | 2 mg oral estradiol valerate + 10 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate | Significantly lower IOP (1.3–2.2 mmHg) after hormone therapy for 12 wks |
Affinito, 2003 | 53 yrs | 50 non-glaucomatous women; 25 women with hormone therapy vs. 25 without hormone therapy (randomized, non-placebo controlled) | Transdermal 17β estradiol (50 μg/day) + medroxyprogesterone acetate (10 mg/day) | Significantly lower IOP (2 mmHg) after hormone therapy at 12 wks and 24 wks No significant change in CCT |
Altintas, 2004 | 47 yrs | 15 non-glaucomatous women | 0.625 mg of oral conjugated equine estrogens + 2.5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate (n = 17) or 2 mg of estradiol hemihydrate (n = 3); 5 women discontinued hormone therapy due to undesirable side effects | Significantly lower IOP (3–4 mmHg) after hormone therapy at 24 wks |
Uncu, 2006 | 48 yrs (Group 1) 52 yrs (Group 2) 51 yrs (Group 3) |
30 women Glaucoma status not specified |
Group 1 (n = 19): 0.625 mg of oral conjugated equine estrogens + 2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone Group 2 (n = 6): oral tibolone Group 3 (n = 5): 3.9 mg/12 cm2 of transdermal estrogen |
Groups 1 and 2: No significant difference in IOP pre- and post-hormone therapy at 6 and 12 mos Group 3: Significantly lower IOP (2 mmHg) after hormone therapy at 12 mos |
The present study | 72 yrs in estrogen-alone trial vs. 72 in estrogen-plus-progestin trial | Final analysis included 4,105 of 4,347 women in the Women's Health Initiative Sight Exam (7% self-reported glaucoma) (randomized, active-controlled) | Estrogen-alone trial: 0.625 mg conjugated equine estrogens Estrogen-plus-progestin trial: 0.625 mg of conjugated equine estrogens + 2.5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate |
Significantly lower IOP (0.5–0.6 mmHg) in estrogen-alone group compared to placebo after 5 yrs of hormone therapy No difference in IOP in the estrogen-plus-progestin group compared to placebo after 5 yrs |
Observational studies | ||||
Toker, 2003 | 53 yrs with hormone therapy vs. 52 yrs without hormone therapy | 62 women; 30 with hormone therapy vs. 32 without hormone therapy Glaucoma status not specified |
0.625 mg of oral conjugated equine estrogens + 2.5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate | No difference in IOP after mean of 4 yrs on hormone therapy Higher serum testosterone associated with higher IOP No significant association between IOP and serum estradiol (E2) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) |
Abramov, 2005 | 66 yrs with hormone therapy vs. 67 yrs without hormone therapy | 214 non-glaucomatous women 107 with hormone therapy vs. 107 without hormone therapy 15% of women had IOP higher than 21 mmHg |
Oral hormone therapy; 89% with combination of estrogen and progesterone and 11% with estrogen alone | No difference in IOP after mean duration of 7 yrs No associations between IOP and estrogen and progesterone exposure as measured by number of pregnancies, number of deliveries, duration of menstruation, or duration of hormone therapy and oral contraceptive use |
Deschenes, 2010 | 57 yrs | 64 women; 35 with hormone therapy vs. 29 without hormone therapy Glaucoma status not specified |
Oral hormone therapy (mixed types, not specified) | No significant difference in IOP after mean duration of 8 yrs |
Tint, 2010 | 53 yrs | 263 non-glaucomatous women 96 with hormone therapy (33 estrogen alone and 58 a combination of estrogen and progesterone) vs.172 without hormone therapy |
Oral hormone therapy (mixed types and duration, not specified) | Significantly lower IOP in hormone therapy group (1.4 mmHg) compared to non-hormone therapy group, adjusted for age, use of beta blockers, and time of IOP measurements No significant difference in IOP between estrogen-alone group vs. a combination of estrogen and progesterone group |
CCT, central corneal thickness; IOP, intraocular pressure; mos, months; wks, weeks; Yrs, years.